https://volney.co/ixperiencit/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=C11.itoteruums3 2026-05-05T00:11:25Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.41.1 https://volney.co/ixperiencit/index.php?title=C11.itoteruums3&diff=440&oldid=prev 2023-11-28T21:03:16Z

<p>Created page with &quot;file ch11.itoteruums old file c6.Awareteruum Updated 10:34 am January 11, 1994 9:23 am Dec 7, 1993 3:29 pm Aug 9, 1993 8:22 am June 23, 1993 Itoteruums What is the purpose of itoteruums? The concept of continuums is a concept that can simplify scientific ideas and make them easier to deal with scientifically. Why is the term important when dealing with the identity theory? Where does the word come from? The word is a concatenation of the words ito or pertaining to the...&quot;</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>file ch11.itoteruums<br /> old file c6.Awareteruum<br /> Updated 10:34 am January 11, 1994 9:23 am Dec 7, 1993<br /> 3:29 pm Aug 9, 1993 8:22 am June 23, 1993<br /> <br /> Itoteruums<br /> <br /> What is the purpose of itoteruums? The concept of continuums is a concept that can simplify scientific ideas and make them easier to deal with scientifically. Why is the term important when dealing with the identity theory? Where does the word come from? The word is a concatenation of the words ito or pertaining to the identity theory of consciousness. pronounced long I - toe the second part is ter which corresponds to the first three letters of terrain. And the last part is uum which corresponds to the word continuum. so the word itoteruum is a continuum of terrains dealing with the identity theory.<br /> <br /> Itoteruumcepts a theocept that deals with itoteruums<br /> <br /> Morals and the identity theory<br /> <br /> Mentaterrain sensefield<br /> <br /> There are many possible awarepaducers that have many awareterrains.<br /> <br /> Awareteruum, a continuum of awareterrains. Awaretertinuum<br /> <br /> Mentateruum, a continuum of mentaterrains.<br /> <br /> Mentaterrain, a mentafield <br /> <br /> Physiterrain<br /> <br /> Neuroterrain<br /> <br /> Senseterrain<br /> <br /> Itoterrain<br /> <br /> Terraincept, a itoterrain represented in the form of a theocept.<br /> <br /> Terrain is a concept that modifies the paths that go through it making some path more likely than others. The terrain can be produced by the awarepaducer and it limitations in producing paths of consciousness. <br /> <br /> Self contained awarepaducer or scawarepaducer or secawarepaducer is an awarepaducer that produces the awarepath and the senspath but is not an imawarepaducer. Which is internally modified without the senspath. In the case of humans and the awarepath that they produce, the senspath appears to be produced externally. Exmawarepaducer is the externally modified awarepaducer.<br /> <br /> Terraintinuum, is a continuum of possible terrains. Where a terrain defines fields of probability where certain paths are more likely than others. We may call them induced fields because they are more likely to produce or induce certain paths than others. The reason that we call it a terrain is because like water physipaths and awarepaths will be more likely to flow along certain paths rather than others. given a certain universe with certain physical and logical laws there will be some physipath that are more likely to be produced than others.<br /> <br /> Morals give us rules to live by but these morals can be counter to the awareterrain of the awarepaducer. There can be many different awareterrains. The concept of awareterrains can be applied to people.<br /> Awareterrain can be modified by the senspath and the externapath. In the human many parts of the awareterrain can not be modified and when they are the consciousness and behavior that is produced is limited by the structure of the awarepaducer. This is because there are certain types of connections, structures and neural functionings in the brain that control certain types of behavior and the consciousness that is produced.<br /> <br /> The awareterrain can be applied to the awarepath and the behaviorpath. When we apply the sensefield to the awareterrain we will form a pattern of awarepaths and behaviorpaths. There will be areas that are much more likely to have paths than other areas.<br /> <br /> We can not control a persons awarepath because we do not know what it is we can make a person feel guilty about his awarepath. What we can monitor is a person behaviorpath and that is what morals is about. Morals are the set of rules of behavior behaviorpaths that are condoned and the ones that are not. Of course behaviorpaths are very complex and every situation is not covered or can not be covered so that a set of rules is set up so that we do not know what to do we refer to the rules for the answer. But the rules are not complete and then we have to make up new rules or improvise. A persons awareterrain will influence the way that he can deal with the rules of behavior. It will be much easier for some people to be moral or to follow the rules than it will be for other because of their particular awareterrain. It must be remembered that each person is a processor of the senspath and the way that he does it will determine if he is moral in his behaviorpath or not. There will be a set of behaviorpaths that are moral and a set that we will call immoral and the rest will be some where in between. If we change what the rules for morality are then we will have a different set of behaviorpaths that are moral. We will call the awarepaths that produce or are in conjunction with a behaviorpath that is moral a moralpath and behaviorpath that are call immoral immoralpaths. There will be a set of immoralpaths that if given different senspaths would have produced moralpaths and visa versa.<br /> There will be a set of awarepaducers that can follow the moral rules easily and then there will be the awarepaducers that can not follow the set of moral rules given the senspath. If we wish people to be moral which means to follow a certain set of rules, we must either make people in such a way that they process the information the same way or in the same type of awareterrain or we must control the senspath so that a person will follow the moral rules. Here I define moral rules as any set of behavioral rules that we want to define. <br /> <br /> The point that I wish to make is that there are all sorts of behaviorpaths that an awarepaducer can produce and that a person being an awarepaducer can produce. Moral rules are backed up with punishments and rewards, which make up part of the senspath of people. If moral rules are the controlling factor with people then ideally we would want to make people so that their awareterrains are conducive to the morals. There are problems with this. First, why do we wish people to follow a certain set of morals or behavioral rules? And punishment them when they don’t? It may be to promote a mental virus like a religion and to perpetuate that religion or mental virus. We do not have the ability to control the awarepaducer. To solve the problems that we face we have to have awarepaducers that can solve the variety of problems that we face.<br /> <br /> Some people will have to work much harder to be moral (to produce an acceptable behaviorpath) than others because the way that they process information. Some people will be able to follow a certain set of moral rules easier than others. There is also the dichotomy between believing in the rules and then having the ability to follow them. There is also the ability to follow the rules with the help of certain types of senpaths and not others. If we know that a certain group of people will not be able to follow the rules within the bounds of their mentaterrains and senspaths what should we do or what can we do. First, what is the degree that the breaking of the rule is bad. Second, is whether the person will do it again. Third, is what do we wish to achieve by having the goals and rules and morals? Or What are our goals for society. There can be many mental viruses that try to perpetuate themselves.<br /> <br /> A real god has nothing to do with religions because a religion is too narrow minded to come from a god. It comes from the mind of man. Why does -- would a god perpetuate the mental virus of men. He does not exist or does not care or know about man. His relation to man will surely be much different than man thinks for he is surely different than man thinks.<br /> <br /> A question if certain awarepaducers can not live within the bounds of the moral rules and laws that a society uses what should be done with these people? This situation will exist within every possible world where there is random awarepaducers, senpath with broad cumulative possibilities and a set of rules that counter the desires of the awarepaducers.<br /> <br /> <br /> God and awarefields<br /> <br /> If a god exists he being all knowing would certainly know what were all the possible awarepaths. He would know what behavior and consciousness each would have and the resultant effects that person would have on reality. He certainly could construct awarepaducers that could allow an awarepath to exist without effecting reality or other awarepaths. Is gods goal to produce all awarepaths that can exist? Is this reality or universe gods awarepaducer? for human and other awarepaths? <br /> Did god create logic and everything else including himself or is he bound by certain things or constraints-- like logic-- such as making something so heavy that he can not pick it up -- when he has unlimited abilities to do anything?<br /> <br /> <br /> Glossary</div>

Mark