Mark: Created page with "file Inawarepath Updated 3:54 pm July 18, 1994/8:14 am March 29, 1993 Topics to cover What the inawarepath is. Subjective view of it. How it works to produce consciousness. The unawarepath Inawarepaths The inawarepath is the part of the awarepath that deals with its own awarepaths. The inawarepath is the part of the awarepath that deals with itself. How it works to produce consciousness? An experience can exist with out consciousness of that experience. Another per..."

2023-11-29T04:15:25Z

Created page with "file Inawarepath Updated 3:54 pm July 18, 1994/8:14 am March 29, 1993 Topics to cover What the inawarepath is. Subjective view of it. How it works to produce consciousness. The unawarepath Inawarepaths The inawarepath is the part of the awarepath that deals with its own awarepaths. The inawarepath is the part of the awarepath that deals with itself. How it works to produce consciousness? An experience can exist with out consciousness of that experience. Another per..."

New page

file Inawarepath
Updated 3:54 pm July 18, 1994/8:14 am March 29, 1993

Topics to cover
What the inawarepath is.
Subjective view of it.
How it works to produce consciousness.
The unawarepath

Inawarepaths

The inawarepath is the part of the awarepath that deals with its own awarepaths. The inawarepath is the part of the awarepath that deals with itself.

How it works to produce consciousness?

An experience can exist with out consciousness of that experience. Another person can experience something and I will not feel it. It seems that part of the brain can feel something and another part will not be aware of it. This can be done either by accident or on purpose. We can imagine a brain structure where the neurons are stimulated but eventually the neurons are not stimulation at the end. What should we call this type of physipath or simiphysipath? We could call it a dead ended physipath. dendphysipath. The next question is does a dendphysipath produce an awarepath. What if there are no recursive connections within this structure so we just have one level after another level of neurons firing. There are two stages the first one is where this dendsimiphysipath is stimulated by a senpath and the second is where there is an end to the stimulation and the physipath stops functioning one level at a time. A level meaning going through a nerve. Different speeds and lengths of the nerves will or can cause the nerves to be out of sequence so a particular nerve can fire more than once as it responds to the incoming signals from slower and faster nerves.
If the end or any part in the sequence of the neural structure are connected by a monitor or and experience machine then it is not a dendphysipath it is monitored -- Monitophysipath

Imagine an awarepath without the inawarepath it will not be aware of anything but what is happening at the very moment that it experiences it. Some experiences take longer to process than others. A philosophical system may be the height of experience processing. Because it takes so long to produce. When we see something the brain processes it into organized information immediately or tries to. We see objects in ink blots.

What is the inphysipath? Does it have relevance? Is it a certain type of processing that produces processing of the awarepath? How do these relate to the recursive awarepaths, physipaths and mentapaths.

An awarepath can not be fully aware of its awarepath all the time. Why it take processing ability to be aware of awareness.
Keeping track of where the awarepath was, where it is, and where it is going is an aspect of consciousness. If we eliminate this awareness of the awarepath we are limited consciousness. This consciousness of the awarepath is integrated into the awarepath and into consciousness. The awarepath is constantly going up and down the awarepath modifying it. It modifies the past and then it modifies the future. It is like a rail road track where there is a cart that goes up and down the track, the cart is always making modifications to the track. It thinks the track is or should be one way, and finds it to be another way and makes some changes to it. It is more like many carts going back and forth making these constantly. The track modifies the carts and the carts modifies the track. The way the cart is going is not necessary the way that it thinks that it is going or wants to go so it always is trying to modify the tracks to see where it going and to go where it wants to go. It also modifies where it is coming from. The information about where it is coming from is limited so the paducer has to organize and simplify the picture so that it can keep track of it. Being aware of a past existence is part of consciousness. Being aware of a future existence is also part of the awarepath. So the awarepaducer in order to be conscious studies the past present and future and tries to tie it together into an awarepath.
What is the subjective picture of what is going on? Let consider a person. That person may be thinking about what just happened to him or what he is about to do. He has a picture in his mind of what he is and what he want to do. All of this is part of his awarepath. He has a picture of his previous or historical awarepath.

The previous or historical awarepath is the one that lead up to where an awarepath is presently. It may or may not be accurate. It certainly not complete and probably not very accurate. He is not necessarily aware of the awarepath or call it an awarepath. He in his mind is trying to produce a picture of the awarepath that he want to happen. Again not necessarily calling it an awarepath. So within his awarepath he is producing a picture of this awarepath in the past and in the future. The picture that he has of his awarepath is not his awarepath but part of it. Imagine an awarepath that has no conception of itself. What would it be like? What would all the possible awarepaths of awarepath be? What should we call this awarepath within an awarepath Inawarepath. It is the part of the awarepath that is about the awarepath. it is made from the words in and awarepath. The relation of the inawarepath and the awarepath. The Inawarepath does not have to correspond to the awarepath at all. But I would guess that
usually it does to some degree. In what situation would the inawarepath not correspond to the awarepath. The Inawarepath is the part of the awarepath that represents the awarepath itself. It can be intermittent in nature that means that the concept of the awarepath can change over time and even disappear so that there is no conception of the awarepath in the awarepath at that time. It is the equivalent of not thinking or being aware of the past present or future as being part of an awarepath. This situation might be pure pleasure where no awareness of now, past, or future exists in"the awarepath. Another time might be sleeping. When we dream we do have a sense of self so we have a sense of the awarepath but that sense of self is modified by the dream. Since we can have periods with limited awarepath and limited inawarepath we should be able to have all sorts of other kinds of or degrees of inawarepaths. For instance where the awarepath is concentration on what is in the future and not in the past or visa versa. It might seem that lower can not have such a developed sense of the inawarepath. However animals have memories and do respond to the past and seem to make plans for the future even if only for the near term future. Can an animal have an awareness of the awarepath in such terms that it can conceive of it and then conceive of an end to it. The animal has to have a concept of itself then it has to have a conception of an end of something then it has to unite the two concepts into one. To be afraid of death the concept has to be united to the feeling of fear.

This idea can be applied to mentapaths and physipaths so we have Inphysipaths an Inmentapaths.
What is happening in the physipath when this process is going on? How does it represent the past present and future in terms of the physipaducer that is one point on a changing physipath?
What would an awarepath be if it did not have a concept of itself. We are not talking about the concept of a person we are talking about the concept of an awarepath what would an awarepath be with out a concept of its awarepath? It would not be consciousness.It could act like it was consciousness. because it could not analyze its own awarepath to make changes to it. Its awarepath would not be aware of its own awarepath so that it would not be consciousness of it self. There are all sorts of this consciousness of its awarepath. An awarepath can be more or less aware of itself. It can be more or less aware of the effect that it has on other awarepaths. It may not even realize that there are other awarepaths and it can have a limited awareness of its own awarepath. The concept of the awareness in an awarepath of itself is a very important concept when it comes to the understanding of consciousness. This brings us to the Question of does every one have the same awareness of their awarepath. The answer is obviously no and this is because the degree that each awarepath deal with itself is different. Can this explain some criminal behavior? I would think that it would. This is because if an awarepath doesn’t have the same awareness of his own awarepath that a another awarepath how can we expect that awarepath to treat that other awarepath with the same respect or consideration when it is not aware of that awarepath. It is always that this processing is intermittent and that the awarepath is not aware of what it does to another awarepath sometimes and at other times does have this awareness. He does the crime when he is either lacking the understanding or his awarepath is not concerned or is not producing pity for other awarepaths.

The awarepath theory of consciousness

The awarepath theory of consciousness is that the awarepath can be aware of itself. The awarepath that is produced has in it a production of an awarepath that it thinks is itself. It may or may not think this. The awarepath has in it memories it may think that those memories are tied to reality or to a dream etc.
The awarepath part of itself that deals with itself is one of the factors that produce consciousness. Imagine an awarepath not dealing with itself or not considering itself An awarepath that has no conception of itself in itself is a nonawarepath or unawarepath. What is a subjective view of this unawarepath?
Is a unawarepath a possibility? What experiences are allowed? If an object appeared of the self then the awarepath would not connect that with the self. The awarepath can use the term self or awarepath but not really know what it means. Is it possible that a person can have an unawarepath
When we try to relate the unawarepath to a person the first term that we use is I. It can not make a referral to itself or if it does it can not know what that referral really means. The word I is one of the first terms that people learn along with my, me, myself. We can see a person using a term with out using that term. An unawarepath does not have to be unconsciousness. it just has to have no inawarepath or siminawarepath in its awarepath. It is possible that. The unawarepath would have memories or could have memories but not with the awarepath in it could have memories of that person that produces the unawarepath. Being aware of every thing but not being aware of the awarepath and that means more that just the name awarepath. But it does not have to include the name. It will not make the connection between itself and the consciousness that it produces. How is the inawarepath different from the mepath? There is a difference and . The awarepath relates many things to each other. The mentapath does this relating unconsciously. It seems that there can be all sorts of things that we can relate things or ideas to in our awarepaths and mentapaths.

There maybe an actual awarepath that happened before the present. There also might not be one in the case of a identireplica. How closely does the present awarepath create a picture of the past awarepath? The present awarepath can believe that it came from another awarepath than it in fact has come from.. Since the present representation of the past awarepath is a subset of many possibilities. It can be represented in many ways exactly though partially, and in many ways only as representations.
It would seem possible that an awarepath could be created by an awarepaducer that can keep track of the past awarepath exactly. The easiest aspect of the awarepath to replicate is the senpath but in replication the senpath we do or will not create the same awarepath given the present the new awarepath.

Glossary

Inawarepath, the part of the awarepath that makes a representation of the awarepath in consciousness.

Inmentapath, the part of the mentapath that makes a representation of itself the mentapath.

Inphysipath,

Unawarepath an awarepath that within itself does not deal with itself. or is aware of itself.

Nonawarepath

Dendsimiawarepath, a dead end simi awarepaths

Dendphysipath. a dead ended physipath. It influences nothing but itself and the neurons that are at the end of the line do not connect to any other nerves, muscles etc. to make any accomplishments or change to the environment.

Monitophysipath, a monitored physipath information is taken from the functioning of the physipath.

Monitosimiphysipath, a monitored simiphysipath.

INAWAREPATH.odt - Revision history