Control over your future 2

File: Control over your future argument

Do we have control over our future experiences and the awarepaths that will exist that has our ixperiencitness?

The nice thing about dying being permanent is that we do not have to worry about having painful or awful experiences ever again. Superimmortality predicts that any physapath that will produce an awarepath that you experience could exist again in the future. This means that your current death does not guarantee that you will not have endless amounts of bad experiences in the future. But just like you can make better and worse decisions about what to do in this life you can also make better and worse decisions in other lives. More importantly you can make decisions in current lives that will increase the likelihood that you can have better future lives. One possibility is that you do not know which physapaths will produce awarepaths that produce your ixperiencitness. So it would be rational to improve as many peoples lives as possible as a general rule because some of them can be yours.

One might want to decrease the amount of anti-superimmortality controlling awarepaths. What this means is that some controlling physapaths will lead to more awful awarepaths or awaresections than others, such as anti-science religious dogmas believing people. Who or what physapath, out of a ixperiencitness grouping of physapath should decide what should be done in the future? Religious and other dogmatic awarepaths producing physapaths might not want there to be any development of science especially superimmortality science and it resulting technology because it disproves their dogmas. This might lead to the extinction of humans. Or to the creation of many awful awarepaths because they do not use good problem solving techniques to make conscious existence more sustainable. These types of destructive awarepaths could be produced in an awarepaducer, where they can actually consciously exist, but where they would not have the potential to destroy the advancement of science, technological and positive society that creates them in the first place.

Is a human life worth living if there are bad to very bad experiences at times? A cave man's life seems to many modern people difficult but was it so bad that a cave man would want to be dead or to die during most of their life? Many people that are alive today have a difficult life but do they wish to be dead or die? There are many people that kill themselves because of the unpleasantness of their current lives. If death is the permanent end to their conscious existence then it is unfortunate for them. If on the other hand if killing yourself is punishable by existing in a hellish place forever then that is even worse. But if killing yourself is an escape form a terrible life that could be experienced much more positively in different circumstances like superimmortality predicts then their deaths is not as terrible as it might seem. But superimmortality does not recommend this when the life can be improved because superimmortality does not promise an after life nor does it promise that an after life will be better than the one you have now. But it does give hope and purpose to the currently existing conscious beings (physapaths) that might be worried about death, because they can work toward making lives better in the future, making sure that conscious beings exist as far into the future as desired and possible, and increasing the possibility that physapaths that produce awarepaths that have your ixperiencitness will exist in the future.