<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://volney.co/wiki/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://volney.co/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Atomic_memory</id>
		<title>Atomic memory - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://volney.co/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Atomic_memory"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://volney.co/wiki/index.php?title=Atomic_memory&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-18T21:40:41Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.23.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://volney.co/wiki/index.php?title=Atomic_memory&amp;diff=3638&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Mark at 17:36, 19 February 2010</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://volney.co/wiki/index.php?title=Atomic_memory&amp;diff=3638&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2010-02-19T17:36:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Atomic memory]] is a [[pseudo scientific concept]] needed for [[assimilation of matter arguments]] for [[singular theories of conscious existence]]. Science has not found any evidence of this property existing. If something like this actually exists it will exist for a short amount of time, with relatively little memory capacity, and be a physical property. It would have to be a memory of a previous or last chemical reaction. There would have to be some physical different between this atom and another atom with the same physical properties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The concept of [[atomic memory]], is basically, besides it normal scientific physical properties, is that atoms or molecules have a way of knowing what they belong to or have belonged to in the past, a memory of this past connection.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most theorists, that are using this concept in their arguments do not even know that they are using a psuedo scientific concept in their reasoning.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mark</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>