Mark at 20:38, 19 June 2018

2018-06-19T20:38:50Z

Mark: Created page with "Supporting evidence for immortality depend on how immortality is defined and for whom. Superimmortality does not have to be continuous over time. If immortality is def..."

2018-06-19T19:23:37Z

Created page with "Supporting evidence for immortality depend on how immortality is defined and for whom. Superimmortality does not have to be continuous over time. If immortality is def..."

New page

Supporting evidence for [[immortality]] depend on how immortality is defined and for whom. [[Superimmortality]] does not have to be continuous over time. If immortality is defined as continuous conscious existence forever for all conscious beings this would be impossible if some conscious beings have died without another body to carry on their consciousness at the time of of death. The multiverse might be so complex that there are many bodies that are producing a versions of everyones consciousness continuously all of the time. This would be hard to prove because we do not have access to all of the multiverse. There is much evidence for superimmortality because continuity through time of a body producing a consciousness that you experience is not a necessity. When the [[science of superimmortality]] defines immortality for a human or other conscious being it defines it as "there never being a time when this human's [[ixperiencitness]] can not be created again some time in the future" This does not mean that there has to be one or more bodies producing a consciousness with this ixperiencitness at all times. Nor does it mean that the universe has to have the ability to produce this ixperiencitness at all times just that at any time there will be a future time when this ixperiencitness can be produced.

To see a supporting list of arguments for superimmortality see:
[[Template:Awaretheory's List of arguments]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:38, 19 June 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Supporting evidence for [[immortality]] ~~depend~~ on how immortality is defined and for whom. [[Superimmortality]] does not have to be continuous over time. If immortality is defined as continuous conscious existence forever for all conscious beings this would be impossible if some conscious beings have died without another body ~~to carry~~ on their consciousness at the time of of death. The multiverse might be so complex that there are many bodies that are producing a versions of everyones consciousness continuously all of the time. This would be hard to prove because we do not have access to all of the multiverse. There is much evidence for superimmortality because continuity through time of a body producing a consciousness that you experience is not a necessity. When the [[science of superimmortality]] defines immortality for a human or other conscious being it defines it as "there never being a time when this human's [[ixperiencitness]] can not be created again some time in the future" This does not mean that there has to be one or more bodies producing a consciousness with this ixperiencitness at all times. Nor does it mean that the universe has to have the ability to produce this ixperiencitness at all times just that at any time there will be a future time when this ixperiencitness can be produced.	+	Supporting evidence for [[immortality]] depends on how immortality is defined and for whom. [[Superimmortality]] does not have to be continuous over time. If immortality is defined as continuous conscious existence forever for all conscious beings this would be impossible if some conscious beings have died without another body continuously carrying on their consciousness at the time of of death. The multiverse might be so complex that there are many bodies that are producing a versions of everyones consciousness continuously all of the time. This would be hard to prove because we do not have access to all of the multiverse or even all of this universe to see if there are continuous, through time, physapaths producing continuous awarepaths and ixperiencitnesses through time. There is much evidence for superimmortality because continuity through time of a body producing a consciousness that you experience is not a necessity. When the [[science of superimmortality]] defines immortality for a human or other conscious being it defines it as "there never being a time when this human's [[ixperiencitness]] can not be created again some time in the future" This does not mean that there has to be one or more bodies producing a consciousness with this ixperiencitness at all times. Nor does it mean that the universe has to have the ability to produce this ixperiencitness at all times just that at any time there will be a future time when this ixperiencitness can be produced.

What is experimental evidence for immortality - Revision history

Mark at 20:38, 19 June 2018

Mark: Created page with "Supporting evidence for immortality depend on how immortality is defined and for whom. Superimmortality does not have to be continuous over time. If immortality is def..."