Difference between revisions of "Lacking the correct terminology argument"

Latest revision as of 15:35, 13 June 2010

Lacking the correct terminology argument is the argument that determining the same person is not the same question as determining the same ixperiencitness. Because the concept of ixperiencitness did not exist as a term for a well defined concept, thinkers were left with confusing, inappropriate, unapplicable terms and meanings that made the understanding of survival and immortality difficult if not impossible. The terms person, body, consciousness, mind, soul, are counter productive when applied to understanding immortality, survival, and life after death.

The concept of "same person" was supposed to mean the same type of thing as having the "same ixperiencitness" but the same person does not mean having the same ixperiencitness.

determining the same person, then using this concept of the same person to predict what is the same person but determining the same person is useful for law in certain cases

You only achieve what you started with, the same person does not have to have the same consciousness or ixperiencitness. We can not use the the concept of the same person to

If you can be the "same person" or the "same ixperiencitness" and you choose to be the same person you either do not understand the terms or you are not concerned about survival in this case. You may be doing the choice selflessly for the benefit of others.

An example in science, before there was a defined term of an electron, the atom was considered solid. Dark energy, Dark matter, species, evolution you can start with a name for some ideas or thing then define it more carefully as time goes on.