Difference between revisions of "Sin and awaretheory"

Revision as of 17:08, 17 January 2013

Awaretheory predicts that awarepaths can exist and be produced that contain what religions define as sinful behavior without ever effecting reality or other conscious beings. Thus it is not a sinful act or behavior.

In an awarepaducer any number of sinful awarepaths can be produced that have the same ixperiencitness as the original sinful person

Is a sinful itobody as bad as a sinful itocomponent? Can a physapaducer give or allow the awarepaths that it creates free will? It can be that the physapaducer is not aware of what awarepaths will be produced until after they actually ocurr. But they will add direction and a starting point for the physapaths.

Is it a sin to produce this sinful awarepath that does no actual sinful action. How do you punish an awarepath that has contained?

Not committed a sinful act

Often it is said by religious individuals that just the though of a sinful act is a sinful act.

Is it a sin if a

A conscious being can commit what realigion says is a sin

can exist with out effecting reality

Because religion are not complex enough, they have not dealt with these ideas that develop from the ideas of awaretheory. When they do they will creating more different types of awarepaths.