Ch 11 cormath 5
File ch 11 cormath
The mathematics of coriginals
Coriginals are possible itopaths of an original.
Oripath is the path of the original
A coripath is the path of the coriginal
coriginals is the term for conceivable originals
The two types of originals are ones that can actually exist within natural reality and ones that no natural reality can produce a real sense path for it. For example traveling through space faster than the speed of light no real sense path can really produce this for real that we know of. However, this does not mean that the body can not function in such a way that consciousness corresponding to science fiction adventures such as star trek, star wars etc.
can not be generated
The mathematics of coriginals not only deals with the relationship of coriginals to originals, cidentireplicas, videntireplicas, awarepaths, itopaths, etc. it deals with what coriginals are actually possible and how to represent and generate them mathematically.
functioning of specific consciousnesses through specific or generalized
“Q” is a symbol for a general theocept relationship
If
Cid(O,U,E,D,T,S1,C1) =Q= Vid(O,U,E,D,T,S2,C2)
then
Ori(O,U,E,D,T,S1,C1) =Q= Cor(O,U,E,D,T,S2,C2)
The reverse
If
Ori(O,U,E,D,T,S1,C1) =Q= Cor(O,U,E,D,T,S2,C2)
then
(O,U,E,D,T,S1,C1) =Q= Vid(O,U,E,D,T,S2,C2)
and
Ori(O,U,E,D,T,S1,C1) =Q= Vid(O,U,E,D,T,S2,C2)
Cid(O,U,E,D,T,S1,C1) =Q= Cor(O,U,E,D,T,S2,C2)
“V” is a subtheocept of “Q” which represents venue equivalence. Venue equivalence is where the videntireplica is in a venue with the original or cidentireplica. It can be any venue such as an awarevenue mentavenue selfawarevenue physivenue etc.
If
Cid(O,U,E,D,T,S1,C1) =V= Vid(O,U,E,D,T,S2,C2)
then
Ori(O,U,E,D,T,S1,C1) =V= Cor(O,U,E,D,T,S2,C2)
The reverse
If
Ori(O,U,E,D,T,S1,C1) =V= Cor(O,U,E,D,T,S2,C2)
then
Cid(O,U,E,D,T,S1,C1) =V= Vid(O,U,E,D,T,S2,C2)
and
Ori(O,U,E,D,T,S1,C1) =V= Vid(O,U,E,D,T,S2,C2)
Cid(O,U,E,D,T,S1,C1) =V= Cor(O,U,E,D,T,S2,C2)
Another type of Q equivalence is + - ^
The relationship of the coriginal to the videntireplica is the same as that of the original to the cidentireplica. All the equations that were developed for originals in relation to cidentireplicas is valid for the relations ship between coriginals and videntireplicas.
The equations for originals only are -.1-, for idoriginals it is -.2-, for cidentreplicas and originals it is -.3-, for cidentreplicas only -.32-, acor -.4-, for videntireplicas it is -.5-, for videntireplicas only it is -.52-, for coriginals -.6-, for coriginals only -.62-,
-.7-, -.8-, -.9-, -.10-, -.1-,
An acoriginal “aco” is an actual coriginal or a coriginal that actually exists. It is short for actual existing coriginal
Equation 1.6.B
Cor(O,U,E,D,T,S,C) =B= Vid(O,U,E,D,T,S,C)
It is hard to argue with the idea that a person will act exactly like itself when all factors are the same except for its name Vid.
Equation 1.6.B1.1.
B[Cor(O,U,E,D,T,S,C)] =B= Vid(O,U,E,D,T,S,C)
This equation states that the behavior of the coriginal is behaviorally identical to the videntireplica. We use the the superscript B1.1. To define that there is one relational operator =B= and one functional operator B[ ...] in the equation.
Equation 1.6.B1.2.
B[Cor(O,U,E,D,T,S,C)] =B= B[Vid(O,U,E,D,T,S,C)]
B1.2 means that there are one relational operator and two functional operators in this equation.
Cormatinterchangability
Equation 2^.62.m
Cor(O,U,E(n µ m),D,T,S,C) =m= Cor(O,U,E(mµ n),D,T,S,C)
In this equation the matter is interchanged. A possible interchange is a carbon atom in the coriginal’s toe, is interchanged with a carbon atom in the its brain.
Equation 2^.6.m
Cor(O,U,E (n µ m),D,T,S,C) =m= Vid(O,U,E,(mµ n)D,T,S,C)
This equation states that if the mater in the coriginal was interchanged with the videntireplica they would still have the same mentality.
Equation 2^.6.B
Cor(O,U,E(n µ m),D,T,S,C) =B= Vid(O,U,E(mµ n),D,T,S,C)
When the matter is interchanged the behavior stays the same,.
Equation 2.6.m.(E)
Cor(O,U,En,D,T,S,C) =M= Vid(O,U,Em,D,T,S,C)
This is true because of equation Equation 2n.1.m and. This equation states that if the coriginal would have been made of different matter (En rather than Em) it would still have been mentally identical to the videntireplica.
Equation 2.62. F
Cor(O,U,En,D,T,S,C) =F= Cor(O,U,Em,D,T,S,C)
It is by definition true because the functioning is the same. Cor(C) == Cor(C) this states that the functioning of the original is identical to itself.
Equation 2.6.F
Cor(O,U,En,D,T,S,C) =F= Vid(O,U,Em,D,T,S,C)
This follows from, or is a consequence of Cor(C) =F= Vid(C) this says that the functioning of the coriginal is functionally identical to the functioning of the videntireplica.
Equation 2.62.B
Cor(O,U,En,D,T,S,C) =B= Cor(O,U,Em,D,T,S,C)
If the coriginal was made of different matter it would still behave the same. Because when two bodies function the same they have the same behavior.
Equation 2.6.B.
Cor(O,U,En,D,T,S,C) =B= Vid(O,U,Em,D,T,S,C)
This equation states like principle 2: the coriginal will behave like the videntireplica if they are made of different matter. When two bodies function the same they have the same behavior.
Principle of Corbehavior
Specific case
Equation 5.62.B
Cor(O,U,E1,D1,T,S,C) =B= Cor(O,U,E2,D2,T,S,C)
The coriginal, if it was in a different space, made of different matter, would still behave the same. This is because its functioning is the same.
General case
Equation 5.62.B
Cor(O,U,E1,D1,T,S,C) =B= Cor(O,U,Em,Dn,T,S,C)
In this general case, the original in any other space, and made of any other matter, where the other conditions are met, will have the same behavior.
Equation 6.6.H(E,D,T)
If Cor(O,U,E1,D1,T1,S,C)== 0 jH
then Cor(O,U,E2,D2,T2,C)== 0 jH
Vitoaccectability
Equation 6.6.H(E,D,T)
If Cor(O,U,E1,D1,T1,S,C)== 0 jH
then Vid(O,U,E2,D2,T2,S,C)== 0 jH
This is a mathematical representation of principle 3 from the first chapter. It states that if the coriginal is a member of the set of possible humans then the videntireplica with identical structure, functioning, and in the same time will also be a human. They will be made of different matter and be in a different space. Where H humaness is defined as behavior and structure H(B,S) within defined limits. H can also be defined as a certain set of sensepaths for an observer. The sensepath produces the sense stimulation that creates the concept of a person for the observer.
Principle 4 Corconsciousness
Equation 6.1.C(E,D)
If M{Cor(O,U,E1,D1,T,S,C)} == 0 jC
then
M{Cor(O,U,Em,Dn,T,S,C)}== 0 jC
If the original is conscious then an original in a different place made of different matter will be consciousness as well.
Principle 4 Vitoconsciousness
Equation 6.3.C (E,D,T)
If M{ Cor(O,U,E1,D1,T1,S,C)} == 0 jC
then M{Vid(O,U,Em,Dn,To,S.C)}== 0 jC
This equation says that if the coriginal is a member of the sum of conscious things then the videntireplica that is made of different matter in a different space and time will also be conscious.
Equation 6.6.HC (E,D,T)
If M{Cor(O,U,E1,D1,T1,S,C)} == 0 jHC
then M{Vid(O,U,Em,Dn,To,S.C)} == 0 jHC
This equation says that if the coriginal is a member of the sum of human conscious things then the videntireplica that is made of different matter in a different space and time will also be a member of the set of human conscious beings.
Equation 6.6.HB (E,D,T)
If B{Cor(O,U,En,Dx,Ti,S,C)} == 0 jBH
then B{Vid(O,U,Em,Dy,Tj,S.C)}== 0 jBH
This equation says that if the coriginal’s behavior is a member of the set of possible human behaviors, then the videntireplica, that is made of different matter, in a different space and time, will have a behavior that will also be a member of the set of possible human behaviors.
Comparison functions are functions that compare the different aspects of the theocept. Comparison functions of coriginals compare the difference between coriginals and any other theocept of the same type. Coriginals and originals or coriginals and videntireplicas. Comparison functions act marginally like ratios. The out put of a comparison function can be a number a theocept a function etc. The comparison can even be coriginals or cidentireplicas. The comparison operator can come in many forms The simplist will be /. But when a specific theocept is used we will use the form /t/ where t can be any theocept. Cor(O,U,En,Dx,Ti,S,C) / Cor(O,U,En,Dx,Ti,S,C) when the two are identical we can define the difference as “1t”. We get this when the two are identical.
Num(Cor(O,U,En,Dx,Ti,S,C)) / Num(Cor(O,U,En,Dx,Ti,S,C)) = 1
This statement is that the numerical conversion of two identical terms when compared will equal 1 when we break this into all its parts and every identical term divided by identical term is reduced to
given any original there can be a mapping for all other paths using the original for the 0th point on a itocontinuum of itopaths.
C(O,Vp,Vm,Va,Vs,) mathematical description of a coriginal
V(O,Vp,Vm,Va,Vs,)mathematical description of a videntireplica
O stands for the original that the coriginal is derived from or being related to
Vp, variance in the physipath from the original
Vm, variance in the mentapath from the original
Va, variance in the awarepath from the original
Vs, variance in the selfawarepath from the original
What is the point of cormath?
Relating coriginals to videntireplicas.
Distinguishing between coriginals mathematically. Mathematically describing the concept of coriginals and videntireplicas.
Some people may not understand the concept of or believe in videntireplicas but most can understand the concept of variations in their life and can conceive this in themselves thus a conceivable original.
?qwertyuoiiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm,.[]
QWERTYUOIIOPASDFGHJKLZXCVBNM,.