Continuum epistemology1

File name continuum epistemology File created date 03:36 pm Sunday, January 8 2006

Why the name Continuum Epistemology instead of continuum psychology. Because these ideas lead to a different way of looking at knowledge. The correct response does not have to be connected to reality but to the reality created by the awarepaducer. The awarepaducer can create a reality that is vastly different than the reality that creates the awarepaducer. How? By controlling what physipath is being produced this is done by controlling the sensepath and enviropath. What does this have to do with itocontinuums. It seems to deal with awarepaducers rather than itocontinuums

epicontinuums

The mappings of realities to awarepaths

You can have an awarepaths in any reality that does not radically mess up the awarepath. What might mess up an awarepath rapid switching of realities or “strobe lighting” the senses with rapid intense changes. The sense path and enviropath might change the structure and functioning of the physipath thus the physipaducer might have to change the physipath back to get the correct awarepath produced.

You can have an awarepath in any reality that does not change the awarepath. When the awarepath (physipath) creates a behavior and the reality produces a response that changes the physipath

Response producer through the sensepaducer --sensepath producer. Certain realities will be able to produce certain sensepaths and not others directly connected to reality and through devices that produce sensepaths and enviropaths. In this universe complexity might be a problem but randomness could be a solution. In other words we may not be able to exactly create the correct desired sensepath for each case but if we replicate the situation over and over again we might by accident create the desired sensepath to create the desired awarepath. The problem might be however in the process you may have created many awarepaths that are not desired.

What makes something a reality. It is what is actually the foundation for things. But actually it is the founding axioms that allow us to predict what will happen. And what will happen are the sensepaths, enviropaths, internapaths. We are trying to predict the sensepaths, enviropaths, and internapaths and thus the awarepaths that they produce.

The sensepath can be played like a movie. No matter what the responses of the awarepath the sensepath is the same for the awarepath. or it can respond to the actions of the awarepath and respond in some predictable or un predictable way. Science is based on getting to the bottom of reality so it can predict what will happen. In other words to understand why the sensepaducer does what it does under the conditions it is under. We have understand what condition it is functioning under this is reality.

In an awarepaducer you can create numerous realities. What do I mean by realities? Where there are a certain set scientific, logical, mathematical, rules that controls the different set of objects that exist in the reality and there will be a certain set of or continuum of awarepaths and sensepath for that reality. Certain awarepaths will be created directly by the reality and others will only be produced in subsystems (simple or complex) not directly connected to that reality