Fitoawarepath

File axioms of fitopaths and Isopaths 10:02 am Monday, November 5 2001

Axioms of fragmented paths --fitopaths

Axiom of fragmentation The functioning of a nervous system can be part of more than one consciousness. One neuropath can be part of more than one different awarepath or mentapath.

A neuron can be part of different consciousness at the same time. It can do one function for one system and do another for another one this may be part of the principle of integration of consciousnesses other neurons will do slightly different precesses so there is redundancy in the system. What is the proof of this neurons can do more than one function ? First one neuron effects thousands of other neurons that are themselves effected by thousands of other neurons. Its behavior is dependent on how the other neurons effect it and its current states and future states. How it effects other neurons is dependent on how the other neurons are effected by still other neurons that are influence it and it current states.

Existence axioms for fitoconcepts

Axiom of existence for fitopaths There can (potential) or does exist fragmented structure and functioning that can produce consciousness. There can or does exist fitopaths. There can or does exist fitoneuropaths. There can or does exist fitophysipaths. There can or does exist fitomentapaths. There can or does exist fitoawarepaths. There can or does exist fito selfawarepaths.

Axiom of existence for fidentireplicas There does or can exist fidentireplicas.

Fragmented neural structure and functioning can produce consciousness. Fidentireplicas can produce consciousness.

Axiom fitoproduction Fragmented neuropath systems can produce consciousness. Fitoneuropaths can produce awarepaths. Fitophysipaths can produce awarepaths. Fitoneuropaths can produce mentapaths. Fitophysipaths can produce mentapaths.

Axiom of fitotemporality Neuropaths fragmented through time can produce consciousness.

Axiom of fitoaffect Certain Fragmented neuropath will not be effective /affective. Fidentireplicas do not have to be effective this means that the consciousness awarepath physipath that they produce does not have to be connected to the reality that creates them. This means that because the parts are spread out in space and produced in a different ways they together will not have the same effect as if they were together. In split brain fitopath there can be effective behavior. There can be all sort of fitopaths that do effect the environment all that is needed is a set of neurons connected to an effective system in a certain way or a complex enough way to produce a behavior or physical change in reality. The neurons simply by its functioning is changing reality but only a very y small amount. For example,

Even neuron fidentireplica where each neuron is inside of another system and the behavior can produce effect first it is producing an effect within its own system for instance with in the dog or person that is producing it second if the end result of the system is a set of neurons that are connected to muscles that do effect the world

Neuron fidentireplicas that are produced in a laboratory -- if the end neurons are connected to a system, can be effective. If the end neuron control the muscles in a person it will create the behavior of the original

Axiom of fitobehavior Fidentireplica produces consciousness of the original without the corresponding behavior that an original or cidentireplica would produce.

Axioms of unification The principles that unify functioning systems into one consciousness We in fact do not know what all goes into producing a consciousness that we experience. We do know that when we effect the functioning and structure of the brain we change the consciousness that is produced. Is it physical connections of matter that is necessary for the production of consciousness? Can it be energy connections like electromagnetic waves that interconnect.

Axiom of Axioms of unification are the principles that explain and predict unifying a consciousness into a whole yet be part of a greater consciousness. The questions that need to be answered are:

Axiom of inclusion One neuropath can be part of more than one awarepath. One neuropath can produce parts of different awarepaths. One neuropath can produce more than one complete awarepath.

Axiom of separateness An awarepath has the ability or aspect to appear to itself to be separate from other awarepaths. A consciousness has the ability or aspect to appear to itself to be separate from other consciousnesses.

The exists awarepaths that do not have this ability or aspect or it is modified in some way to make it seem to be unified with nature or other consciousness or gods or god concept.

Axiom of hierarchy Consciousnesses can include other consciousnesses. Awarepaths can include other awarepaths.

The functioning of a neuropath can include functionings and structures that produces other neuropaths. The effect of one awarepath on another awarepath depends on how the two are connected and how that effects the functioning and structure of the consystem. The effect of one neuropath on another neuropath depends on how the two are connected and how that effects the functioning and structure of the consystem.

Axiom of interaction of matter To produce consciousness we have to create interaction between matter in specific ways. There may need to be specific types of interaction. For instance, radio wave communication might not work or it might so might QM communication. Maybe Qm communicates through time as well as space. Maybe there is not QM communication between universes.

Axiom of duplication of process, functioning or behavior To create the consciousness we have to duplicate the functioning.

Axiom of duplication of structure. To create consciousness we have to start with the correct structure.

Axiom of fragmented size Fragmentation is possible with certain structural units of a certain size and functional ability. For instance, units of neurons this would not allow for the concatenation of atoms into a fitoneuron. A fitoneuron would be a neuron that is created by the combination of atoms that are fragmented -- separated in space and or time but together produce the functioning of the neuron.

How is it that brains do not come together to produce a consciousness greater than themselves? Maybe they do, but we do not know about it because we are the lower consciousness (that does not see the unification) in the hierarchy of consciousness. In this case there will be different levels of consciousness produce that appear to be independent of each other. Maybe there is some dependence that we do not know about that we can see at a higher level. What about the problem of This may be solved by the outline process we look at a functioning and structure and we outline the functioning structure even if it overlap other systems that correspond to other consciousness. This still does not tell us why that consciousness does not experience the totality of the set of functioning Maybe to produce the physipath to experience it all we have to generate a different physipath entirely. If this physipath is within the principle of the outline is that what is with in the outline is a consciousness If we make another outline another consciousness of course not every outline will produce consciousness. Then we have the concept of outlining to large of an area so that there is a consciousness produced within but that there is excess functioning and structure that is not required for this outline. This is call the minimum outline--- mimoline this is the minimum outline to produce the desired consciousness Physoline the physical outline that produces a specific consciousness neuroline the minimum outline in a system

Consystem is a consciousness producing physical system that produces mentapaths or awarepaths

What produces unification of a consciousness? This means that what makes one consciousness seems to be part of one functioning and structure and not another. Maybe it only seems to be separate consciousnesses. Maybe it is all one consciousness that has parts that appear to be separate. But we still have the question how is the appearance of separateness of consciousness produced? What are the rules that underlie this process? What examples do we have to go by? Because we do not know any thing for certain we could be in an experience machine that has not relation to reality.

Axiom of separation What about multiple built up consciousness on one system. If one neural system produces different consciousness why are they not unified into a specific consciousness? Maybe there is a process of separation of consciousness based on certain physical laws.

The bizarre nature of fidentireplicas or fitopaths is that one neurons functioning in one way would be sufficient for all times and places to be part of all consciousness that need it. If fidentireplicas the functioning has to be time space and