Fractidentireplica 13

file Fractidentireplica 05:01 pm March 8 2000

Fractional cidentireplica is a fracidentireplica or fractidentireplica is a fractional part of a cidentireplica or part of a fidentireplica

Fragmented cidentireplica is a fidentireplica

There are numerous kinds of fidentireplicas because there are numerous ways to split a cidentireplica and keep identical functioning.

We can ask questions for each type of fidentireplica and fracidentireplica: Will they be consciousness? Will they have identical consciousness to the original? If they do not, what consciousness will it (they) have? Why do they have the consciousness that they have if it is not identical?

Simicitopaths is part of the path of a cidentireplica either physipath or awarepath etc.

Fractionalpaths fractipath a fractional path It is a grouping of parts or fractions of other physipaths that fit together into a different physipath identical to a different original. A fractional physipath will have neurons that are separated by a greater distance than there is in the brain. We can apply ideas about cidentireplicas, videntireplicas, itopaths, itovenues etc to it.

simicidentireplicas part

A fidentireplica is a cidentireplica where the neurons are separated but every neuron is functioning exactly like the original. A Fractidentireplica is one of the parts. We do not have to ahve complete neurons in a fidentireplica. There are sectional fidentireplicas that are divided into sections neural fidentireplicas that are divided into complete neurons . WE can also have mixed neural fidentireplicas that are both types.

We can imagine many different fractional versions of cidentireplicas for example where a certain part of the brain is functioning exactly like that part in the whole cidentireplicas we can ask what will be the consciousness that is produced in this situation. When we ask the right questions we begin to understand the consciousness produced.

Experiment

Imagine a cidentireplica of you at the present time, then removing parts of the nervous system but keeping the rest functioning identically, Will there will be a decrease in mentality produced if enough of the neurons are removed?.

Concept -- Dividing the parts but keeping all the parts functioning identically. There will be no direct connection between the parts but the information that the parts provide each other will interact. This is knowledge. This is conformation--consciousness information (joke) There will be knowledge transferred between the parts or there will be a set of knowledge (algorithm) that runs the functioning of the divided neurons Questions for this situation Will this divided system produce consciousness Will it produce consciousness exactly like the undivided system. How is it possible to make such a system? Each neuron will have to function like the original. To get it to function like the original there will have to be some over all system connected in some way or each neuron will have to have a built in or external source of cause of the functioning. Will this effect the consciousness produced? Why will distance make a difference if the functioning of the brain was made smaller would this effect the consciousness produced. If other systems produced this divided system with in themselves will a hidden consciousness be produced or is the complexity of this system make it impossible? There is the case where we have the purposeful situation and the situation where this is achieved within other consciousnesses. Does this functioning have to be at the correct time sequence? This means will the firing of these neurons have to be in a sequence. For example in case one where neuron A stimulates neuron B which stimulates neuron C will this order have to be created in the divided system If divided systems can produce consciousness like this then there will be a lot of consciousness that can be produced of all sorts from fewer consciousness systems

Why would it have to be together to produce consciousness? What unique property would togetherness create? What is unique is that algorithm that creates this functioning sequence or the

Why would, why wouldn’t a divided system produce consciousness? Why would, why wouldn't a divided non synchronous system produce consciousness? The knowledge is there even in a divided system unless it happens randomly. There may be other algorithms that will produce the same functioning will this effect the consciousness produced?

They (neurons) are not together they are not effecting each other. They are together they are effecting each other.

Four situations for fidentireplicas Purposeful consciousness one or more consciousnesses produces it or controls the production of it. Algorithmic there is no immediate conscious control Random firing of neurons in conscious beings Random firing of neurons in non conscious beings

Where is this consciousness produced? Of course the consciousness produced has nothing to do with the reality out side of its consciousness. As a result we do not have a problem with having this consciousness connected to a specific place.

What about the sequence that diverges and converges to this consciousness? If this is true how likely is it if it is non sequitur? If it is not in sequence can a neuron firing be part of different consciousnesses? Is it possible that there is a ratio of the conscious functionings and the not consciousness functionings that is so small that there will be very few divided non synchronous with in other systems? If the system is more than the sum of its parts then how does being together and synchronous add to it the consciousness? How does this apply to a superpath with many humans?

This path divided non synchronous path would have no way to control itself. It would be a self within a self (or many selves) and it would not know it. It would be an artifact of the other functionings and other consciousness. A case of consciousness with a consciousness or a path with in a paths.

This certainly allow for many more paths to be created. How many more? If it is non synchronous maybe the functioning has not occurred so does this mean that the consciousness will not exist until this has occurred? How doe we make a distinction among the different awarepaths? Why will this functioning be a part of this awarepath and not the other awarepath Or will it be part of both How and when does it become part of both?

Questions Can we do these experiments? Will there be an effect on consciousness produced? If so why?

Does this tell us something about knowledge? Not all functionings or combinations corresponds to knowledge (consciousness) or can create a knowledge (consciousness) system. Are there different sets of functioning physipaths that correspond to the same system of knowledge or consciousness this is true but what about radically different functionings will there exist radically different physipaths that correspond to the same awarepaths or knowlepath? How would we know if a radically different physipath will produce the same awarepaths a divided non synchronous physipath will produce the same awarepath? This might be a case where a radically different physipath produces the same awarepath. It would work if not a lot of extra awarepaths physipaths were produced but with the myriad of possibilities there would be a lot of these dinosyncopaths divided non synchronous paths. The consciousness will not be in a place or time in relation to the functioning it will be in relation to reality.

Experiments to consider

1. Separating the functioning neurons but they are still communicating by larger and larger amounts but keeping all the neurons functioning the same. what effect on behavior and consciousness or awarepath the physipath will change what about the knowlepath The structure path will change. The potentivenue will change this is the different paths that are possible under the same circumstances. 2. Separation the neurons with increasing distance but there is no communication between the neurons the functioning stays the same by other means what are these other means algorithmic purposeful

Accidental Random

Random natural combination of nerpaths

There are a number of experiments that come under this category. Imagine taking a set of humans. Within that set is a set of neurons. Each neuron has produces functioning path or nepath that defines how the neurons functions over time. If dividing the functioning still produces the same consciousness any where in the universe all animals (life forms) that have neurons will be part of this set of possible nerve combinations. (does consciousness tie together over distances like gravity does at the speed of light? Or is it instantaneous or no tie at all)

Question Does the random natural combination of nerpaths produce consciousness? When considering this question is there a distance limit between neurons what type of synchronization in time is necessary? Does any random natural combination of nerpaths produce consciousness that corresponds to a consciousness producing physipath? Can one nerpath be part of many different physipaths that produce different consciousness. Another way to state this question is If there are many different complete physipaths except for one nerpath, can that one nerpath be the one necessary nerpath for all the different physipaths producing awarepaths? Or can one nerpath be part of more than one awarepath.

If RNCN--Random natural combination of nerpaths produces many different awarepaths we then have natural experience machines. The more neuron based life forms that exists the more likely that these types of awarepath will be produced. Between us will be produced many consciousness that we will never be aware of. There will be no feed back there will be no senpath there will be no decision making but there will be numerous awarepaths that will be created. If this is not true and it seems very bizarre if it is, Why is it no? What factors are missing in this situation that exists in the combined state of neurons? How can we find out the answer to this situation? How do we look at this situation to find the answers? Sub paths exist how does this relate to RNCN. How can subpaths exist in this situation. If all the functioning is combining it would seem that there would be only one awarepath and that would be one path the combination of all paths. But the way that we just stated this it would allow all sub path to exist as well. It is almost like there is a substructure dealing with knowledge consciousness that has a set of rules like physics that deals with the underlying nature of consciousness and how it exists. Every nerpath could exist by itself

Does the Random natural combination of nerpaths through time produce consciousness?

Random separation through time If consciousness is possible through random natural combination of nerpaths what is produced when they are not synchronized in time

3. Separation through time with and without communication how is communication through time possible? 4.Elimination neurons but keeping the functioning of rest of the neurons the same what effect on consciousness behavior will be the same because functioning will stay the same.

Can it be in this situation that there will be a difference in the mentapath but not in the awarepath this means that there is a difference in the mentality but there is not an awareness of this difference Taking the situation where there is a random creation of the exact functioning of neurons in a set of other conscious beings (humans) simultaneously exactly in the same sequence as in the original will there be the consciousness produced as in the original? A more specific example will if one neurons in each different person functions exactly its corresponding originals neuron

If one neurons functions like a originals neuron for a period of time will this imply that others parts will have to function identically also. In body A it will be conveying one message and in the new capacity it will be conveying a different message. This gives the message the importance of consciousness the sum of the messages that are created is the knowlepath What if we not only have identical functioning but the identical knowlepath for the neuron. Would the neuron have to carry the knowlepath for the entire brain no but it might have to for a large part of the brain How to we define the knowlepath of a neuron? All that impinged on it and it impinges on what do we mean by impinges on . So many neurons effects it and it effect so many neurons the neurons that effect it are tied to many other neurons that effect other neurons. the same functioning of a neuron in a different structure will /can have a different meaning or produce a different effect of the functioning of the brain So will it have a different effect on consciousness? So how do we produce the neuroknowlepath that is necessary for a specific consciousness?

More experiments and questions Do the neurons have to be connected to produce consciousness?

How do the neurons make decisions if it is part of a system that is producing a different consciousness?

Ner is the nerpath of a single nerve 3Ner is the summation many different nerpaths of a single nerve

Ori(1)(U,O,E,D,T,S,C) =M= 3Ner(v)(U,O,Ey,Dy,Ty,Sy,C)

The functioning of the individual neurons will stay the same the structure will be different

Awa(U,O,E,D,T,S,C) =M= 3Ner(U,O,Ey,Dy,Ty,Sy,C) An awarepath of the original O will be mentally equal to the sum of the nerpaths of the original the matter space time and structure can be different.

Cuni stands for the consciousness universe . This is where the neurons that are not conected in a system still form a consciousness system. Out side of this disjointed neurons do not form a consciousness this universe may or may not be a cuni. Uni this stands for universe Puni this stands for physical universe of Cuni where disjointed neurons produce consciousness

Fid the parts are separated by distance but the knowledge is transferred between the parts.

Fac this is a fractional part there may not exist the other parts but the knowledge of the parts is still created.

What happens when the creation of the knowledge is different?

Ori(1)(U,O,E,Dx,T,S,C) =M= Fid(v)(U,O,E,Dy,T,S,C)

Ori(1)(U,O,E,Dx,T,S,C) =M= 3Fac(v)(U,O,E,Dy,T,S,C)

The point is that the knowledge that is recreated to generate the exact functioning is what is the consciousness. ?

Equation 1.3M(Enm,Dxy,Tij) Ori(O,U,En,Dx,Ti,S,C) =M=Fid(O,U,Em,Dy,Tj,S,C)

Ori(O,U,En,Dx,Ti,S,C) =M=Fac(O,U,Em,Dy,Tj,S,C)

3Dåç䟠   …À ∆« Within

With in a human what happens when there are two different consciousness produced? Within a human there may be the exact functioning of a worm for instance, not that a worm has much consciousness but will it be identical

An analogy might be a palindrome the more complicated a sentence the less likely can we turn it around and have a meaningfull sentence. It may not be as likely as it seems for a number of neurons to function in a certain way when they are separated and functioning randomly producing a different consciousness. If we take a number of people the fractipaths that group will or can produce could include awarepaths subawarepaths superawarepaths simipaths. The paths that the

Is there an answer to these questions about consciousness and fidentireplicas? Why are there answers to these questions? A number of these questions can be stated as yes or no questions. Any one that can be answered will give us information. A lot of the information can be understood in more complex form than yes or no questions. Through logical thinking can we determine the answer to these questions? Is there enough empirical information to answer these questions? Can we understand the relationship between consciousness and the body or the awarepath and the physipath. Is this relationship undertandable by the human mind? By any mind? Is there an analogy in experience that we can use to understand this relationship? Better? If we understand fidentireplicas will we understand consciousness or its relationship to the bodies functioning?