Logical foundations for the science of superimmortality

Logical foundations for the science of superimmortality

Logical foundations:

Identical repetition of structure and functioning is logically possible, Identical repetition of an actual previously existing structure and functioning (physapath) is logically possible, Identical repetition of a conceivable structure and functioning (physapath) is logically possible,

Nearly identical repetition of structure and functioning is logically possible, Nearly identical repetition of an actual previously existing structure and functioning (physapath) is logically possible, Nearly identical repetition of a conceivable structure and functioning (physapath) is logically possible,

Why logically possible? No contradictions in these statements, no paradoxes, physical not a claim to magic or other supernatural processes. Structure and functioning is an understandable concept Structure and functioning is an scaleable concept

Logically possible means not logically contradictory, does not contradict the definition of the terms used, the probability of them actually existing is not zero. It does not means that they will ever exist just that they can possibly exist. The probability might be very small however.

How could these statements be falsified? If they are found to be logically contradictory. If the probability of their existence is found to be zero. The terms used have contradictory meanings. Just because there is not one case that falsifies something does not mean that it is not correct.

There are no cases where this is true There are several cases where this is not true There are many cases where this is not true There are an enumerable amount of cases where this prediction is not true For all cases this principle or prediction is not true There is one case where this prediction is true There are several cases where this is true There are many cases where this is true There are an enumerable amount of cases where this is true For all cases this principle is true

All of these can give some level of usefulness

There are no black swans. (in the past, now, in the future) Black swans do not exist. There are several places that black swans exist. There are many black swans. X There are an enumerable amount of black swans.

X defines what superimmortality predicts

There are no identical physasections.(in the past, now, in the future) Identical physasections do not exist. There can be some identical physasections. X There are many identical physasections. There are an enumerable amount of identical physasections.

There are no nearly identical physasections.(in the past, now, in the future) Nearly identical physasections do not exist. There can be some nearly identical physasections. There are many nearly identical physasections. There are an enumerable amount of nearly identical physasections. X

There are no closely identical physasections. (in the past, now, in the future) Closely identical physasections do not exist. There can be some closely identical physasections. There are many identical closely physasections. There are an enumerable amount of closely identical physasections. X

No Identical physasections ever produce identical behaviorsections. Some Identical physasections produce identical behaviorsections. Most Identical physasections produce identical behaviorsections. All Identical physasections produce identical behaviorsections. X

No nearly identical physasections ever produce identical behaviorsections. Some nearly identical physasections produce identical behaviorsections. Most nearly identical physasections produce identical behaviorsections. All nearly identical physasections produce identical behaviorsections. X

No closely identical physasections ever produce identical behaviorsections. X Some closely identical physasections produce identical behaviorsections. Most closely identical physasections produce identical behaviorsections. All closely identical physasections produce identical behaviorsections.

No Identical physasections ever produce identical awaresections. Some Identical physasections produce identical awaresections. Most Identical physasections produce identical awaresections. All Identical physasections produce identical awaresections. X

No nearly identical physasections ever produce identical awaresections. Some nearly identical physasections produce identical awaresections. Most nearly identical physasections produce identical awaresections. All nearly identical physasections produce identical awaresections. X

No closely Identical physasections ever produce identical awaresections. X Some closely Identical physasections produce identical awaresections. Most closely Identical physasections produce identical awaresections. All closely Identical physasections produce identical awaresections.

No Identical physasections ever produce identical ixpesections. Some Identical physasections produce identical ixpesections. Most Identical physasections produce identical ixpesections. All Identical physasections produce identical ixpesections. X

No nearly identical physasections ever produce identical ixpesections. Some nearly identical physasections produce identical ixpesections. Most nearly identical physasections produce identical ixpesections. All nearly identical physasections produce identical ixpesections. X

No closely identical physasections ever produce identical ixpesections. Some closely identical physasections produce identical ixpesections. Most closely identical physasections produce identical ixpesections. All closely identical physasections produce identical ixpesections. X