Munefidentireplicas 2

File munefidentireplicas 04:45 pm Monday, June 25 2001

effect of neurons on fidentireplicas

The meaning of the functioning of a neuron or a system will vary with the whole system. The meaning of the functioning of a neuron can be the opposite of the same functioning in a different system or even in the same system when the rest of the system is functioning differently. How is this possible? and How does this fact effect fidentireplicas?

An atom doing the same functioning can have different and or opposite meanings in same neuron when it is functioning.

When we consider a divided set of neurons what is the meaning of the functioning of the neurons when they can have many different meanings for the same functioning in fact the same functioning neuron may have different meanings for the same functioning in the same brain.

The more complex the brain the more meaning or more complex the meaning that the functioning of the neuron can have. What is the proof of this? How does this effect the concept of a fidentireplicas? We can also have more redundancy with more neurons. Many neurons are effecting the neuron and it in turn effects many neurons

What types of neural networks can we consider with one neuron it will have a certain structure or geometry. How can we change its topology to get the same results for the network and for the consciousness produced. Physical constraints will effect how much we can change the shape of the neuron and still get the same results.

Consider the case of neurons with each type of fidentireplica experiment

We can consider the one neuron experiment removing replacing removing with the same functioning of the system with the same We then can consider the case with more neurons

we can consider the case with the dividing of the parts of the brain together in the brain but not touching with communication with out communication, then with distance increasing distance, with time difference

If we start with the acceptance of the concept of divided neuron fidentireplicas producing consciousness what will be the consequences and by doing this can we disprove that it will produce consciousness. For understanding purposes we can imagine drawing lines around the neuron that are supposed to add to the consciousness of the fidentireplica. By doing this we can imagine one neuron being part of many different consciousnesses. Can we imagine bringing this together into a whole system that actually produces many different consciousnesses using each or many of the neurons as part of different human consciousness ( or other identifiable consciousnesses)

munefidentireplicas--- multi neuron fidentireplicas are fidentireplicas that use the fact that one functioning of a neuron can have many meaning depending on the system that it is in. And that the meaning changes with the structure and functioning of the system we can make the line system in divided neuron fidentireplicas to distinguish between functionings and consciousnesses possibly produced

Maybe the neuron in the contributing brain will only add the meaning that the neuron functioning in the brain does.

The neuron in the contributing brain will have a certain set meaning that can change for the system over time. Is this the only meaning that the neuron can add over time to a munefidentireplica. Why might this be the case? Why might it not be the case? and how does this effect mune fidentireplicas If the meaning that is produced in the neural system by the neuron and not all the possible is the only possible contribution to a fidentireplica then there will be many fewer possible mune fidentireplicas

We can ask questions as to how many different consciousness a particular neuron meaning can contribute to. Does it have to contribute to a certain level of consciousness or even to a specific consciousness. Because its meaning is specific

If fidentireplicas can not exist or do not exist they help define consciousness by what it is not.

We can say that a specific total functioning neuron system produces a specific consciousness but we can not say that the same part when added to a different system will have the same meaning. It might have the same meaning. What would be the condition for there to be a sub system with the same meaning with in a different total system?

Let make a comparison to the whole brain we assume that a brain will produce a certain consciousness no matter what it is connected to as long as the original functioning is the same If this is true then we might apply the same idea to the neuron no matter what the neuron is connected to it is still producing the consciousness of that neuron what it does is get other neurons to functioning in a certain way.

What if we use the concept of cycles with in cycles the neurons are cycling we thus have cycling within cycles because systems in the brain might be cycling as well

We can also consider structure. strucutre effects functioning