Potential you argument 3

From ixperiencit
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File Potential you argument

Was there the potential for you to consciously exist before you did actually exist?

If this is so then what happened to this potential to exist after your death? By living how has this destroyed this potential for you to exist?

Can potential to consciously exist be connected to a specific time or space? A human body can not exit inside a star or black hole plus other places without specific life supporting devices and conditions. Since stars and other places that can not produce and support conscious life are moving through space the potential can vary over time for a space


How does death destroy this potential for conscious existence?

Could there not have been this potential before your existence

It appears that something has been lost from this potential for you to exist again. What could have been permanently lost at death that no longer exists? The potential for the same structure and functioning stills exists which will produce the same behavior. It also appears that the same conscious can be produced. To make it so that you do not exist again death means that the same ixperiencitness can never exist again. But what about percentage wise the same ixperiencitness can it be created again. If not then there would be many identical consciousness that can exist again after death but many ixperiencitnesses that can not exist. Ixperiencitness is not tied to consciousness or structure and functioning. Every time a physapath is produced a different ixperiencitness is produced even though the different physapath can produce a consciousness that believes it has the same ixperiencitness.

How can we tell the different ixperiencitnesses apart when the structure and functioning and consciousness produced are identical. If they can not be told apart then is there an actual difference?


How does death effect the potential for a specific ixperiencitness to exist again? It is as if there is something supernatural causing this disconnect what physical or supernatural thing can cause this disconnect?

If by some random event identical physapaths are produced at the same time what is the process that makes one ixperiencitness go into or be produced by one body and a different one be produced by a different body?

Then there most not have be a specific potential ixperiencitness for a specific physapath. Every identical physapath creates a random ixperiencitness even when there is evidence that they have the exact same consciousness. This still produces the problem of how a random ixperiencitness is produced and never copied by another physapath. How does it know that it can not produce an ixperiencitness that has been produced before. If the process is random them the process will select from a set of possible ixperiencitness and then can select the same one  again. If the pool of possible ixperiencitness is reduced by one each time then how many ixperiencitness in total exist. How does the pool of ixperiencitness get reduced by one when a new conscious physapath is produced?


For this to work there could not be a continuum of ixperiencitness because a 99% identity of ixperiencitnesses, would be for many, as good as life after death


Solutions:

   1. Unique creation: Each ixperiencitness is a unique one time only creation. No awareness of death is necessary because the universe can not make another one. What other physical thing is a unique creation? How does this effect the potential to produce an ixperiencitness?
   2. Material impossibility:There is no place where the physapath that produced the ixperiencitness can be created again. No matter, matter too thin. too cold, matter too dense, no universe, all energy no matter universe. where matter is necessary to produce a brain,
   3. Supernatural impossibility: If there is a supernatural aspect of a person, that is necessary to produce the ixperiencitness, and it can no longer exist. 
   4. Too complex to ever exist again: a physapath is too complex to ever exist again, an awarepath is too complex to ever exist again, an ixperiencitness is too complex to ever exist again. Different physapath are constantly being produced that are just as complex and any other human physapath
      

Critic:

   1. Unique creation: even if a physical thing can not be produced, it can be approximated. The closer a physical thing becomes like another thing the more closely it will produce properties that the first thing produces like consciousness and ixperiencitness. How close does the physapath has to be like another physapath to produce identical consciousness or ixperiencitness?
   2. Material impossibility:A universe could eventually have properties that do not allow it to produce conscious brains or bodies, however later it could again have a correct environment for conscious bodies to exist again for example if the universe is cyclic. If this universe can never produce conscious bodies again does not mean that there cannot be other bodies that are or will produce conscious bodies
   3. Supernatural impossibility: before we use this solution there needs to be proof that there are supernatural aspects of reality and then that these supernatural property actually keep a particular ixperiencitness from existing again.
   4. Too complex to ever exist again: each existent ixperiencitness was at one time not too complex to exist. With the enhancement of consciousness it should be easier to create desired ixperiencitnesses. Increasing the total number of consciousnesses that exist through out the universe, the more likely that any particular ixperiencitness will exist again.  Different human physapaths are constantly being produced that are just as complex as any other human physapath. Different human awarepaths are constantly being produced that are just as complex as any other human awarepath. Different human ixperiencitnesses are constantly being produced that are just as complex as any other human ixperiencitness. Complexity is in itself is not the problem for producing physapaths awarepaths and ixperiencitnesses.
   5.