Proofs identity simitopaths 1
File name -- proofs identity simitopaths File created date --01:46 am Thursday, August 25 2005
A simipath argument s for awarepaths and physipaths
Parts of different awarepaths can be identical
Parts of different physipaths can be identical in structure and functioning for a period of time. To prove this lets take the negative of this statement-- there are no identical functioning sub structures in any potential and actual physipaths. This means no two different physipaths can have identical sub functionings All we have to give in one example take a brain change the functioning or structure of one neuron in that brain it is now a different physipath than the original most of the brain will continue to function the same until the effect of this different neurons reaches all parts of the brain so there will for some period of time be parts of the brain’s simiphysipaths that are functioning identically to the original. We can imagine many possible simi physipaths that are the same in different physipaths of the human brain.
Why is this concept important?
Having identical simiphysipaths means that there can be identity in simiawarepaths as well.
Why is the identity of simiawarepaths in larger awarepaths important? We can compare simiawarepaths. We can say that such and such an animal is producing the same consciousness as part of a human physipath or not. Or a human physipath is or can be part of a superphysipath meaning that part of the superphysipath is producing an awarepaths equal to a human awarepath.
Two proofs for simiawarepaths being identical in larger awarepaths.
The future awarepath of a person is like the previous awarepath of a person. The closer together they are in time the more likely they are to be identical. But this does not mean that at a later time the awarepath can not converge as the physipaths converge.
It is possible that every different simiphysipath path produces a different simiawarepath. But it is not likely. We can imagine the nervous system as a topological system of knots and ropes and what the awarepath is, is like little cars running around on these tracks of topological structure
There are two aspects that we can consider that the awarepath is so complex that every change to the physipath produces a change in the awarepath. If it is not, we ask the question what changes can we make or what can we withdraw from the physipath and still have or create the same awarepath?
There is also the questions of chunks of awarepaths or how to keep together simiawarepaths within awarepath or awarepath within superawarepaths. Is it possible or not this deals with the concept of joining of paths or the concept of encompassing of awarepaths within superawarepaths.
It would be possible that the rest of the functioning is necessary supporting structure not get correct awarepath produced even if it is not needed at the present to produce the present awaremoment. Maybe a lot of the brain functioning is for potential awarepath production not present awarepath production. If this is the case then many awaremoments could be created with much less structure or much less functioning. But what if you still need the complete structure and what change is the way the structure functions rather the structure changing itself so you can not make many change to the physipath. So if you want a simiawarepath produced then you get the physipath to function that way. So it may be that many superawarpaducer could produce an awarepath just by limiting the functioning of the superphysipaducer in the correct way. This concept would mean a human awarepath could be produced in the mind of “god” with the limiting of the super physipath.