SOULPATH 2

FILE CH19.soul &8:42 am 9/20/94 /8:16 pm May 8, 1993 this is the combination of files soulpath and ch19.soul

to mathematically define a soul path we need a definition of what the soul is. It is supposed to be the essence of a person Sp[ T, S, M,C, P ,R, U] Sp stands for soulpath t is time ,S is space, M is matter, C is consciousness or total awarepath of all people that have this soul, P is the people that have this soul. R is for the religious factor U is the unknown factor. ]<>}]}

CHAPTER 19

THE CONCEPT OF A SOUL

Topics to cover: Definition of soul. The identity theories definition of a soul. How the continuum hypothesis applies to the soul. Why is the soul important to people? Relate the soul to the awarepath Relate the soul to the mentapath Relate the soul to the physipath

Order of topics

Definition of a soul

A person’s soul is supposed to be the most important part of a person. The soul is generally considered to be the immaterial essence, animating principle, or actuating cause of an individual life. As quoted from Webster's dictionary. There are many possible, more specific definitions of a soul emanating out, of the above general definition. The soul is"supposed to be the most important aspect of a person for most religions. " Do not sell your soul to the devil!" is a religious expression. The soul is supposed to be a unique, immortal, and immaterial thing or at least that is what you are lead to believe by many religions. This type of a soul is not dependent on memories, feelings, emotions, that happen to it in life. If it would have had a different type of life, with different experiences, it would still be the same soul. This soul is supposed to regenerate into new people for another life or to exist after life in a heaven / hell scenario. This type of soul usually has a beginning but not necessarily an end. It is conceded that the same soul under different circumstances will act differently.

What is the proof for a soul? What is the reason for believing in a soul?

The problem with an immaterial essence that has the property of a soul is that we have no real evidence for it. If scientists would have found such a thing we would know about it. The belief in a soul is based on faith, tradition, and lack of knowledge of how the body works. An argument frequently used against scientists, when it comes to souls, ESP, UFOs, astrology or other pseudo scientific investigations is that scientists do not want people to know the truth and thus they suppress the facts that would support these beliefs. There is no doubt that people have a tendency to suppress information that they do not want others to know about. But more than any other belief system science demands open mindedness when it comes to new and unexplained information.Because scientists can gain greater wealth and fame from finding new and different things about our world, especially if they are useful or interesting, there is little reason to believe that they would hide evidence about souls or other pseudo sciences. There is always a crop of new and eager scientists that want to make major discoveries in any field that has new areas to discover. They care little that in the process that they may be destroying cherished beliefs of other scientists. There is always on going intellectual battles between scientist and their theories.

Scientists may not like to believe in and use immaterial essences but they do not reject them when there is good and substantial evidence for them. Energy is an immaterial essence that affects matter like a soul is supposed to do. Light and gravity are immaterial essences. But with much effort scientists have tied the two together in predictive explanatory scientific theories. Gravity is another postulated theory that has not been tied to other areas of energy. Until the advent of computers and computer controlled machines the animating principle was an important, little understood aspect of life (the animation process is that process that goes about producing motion within and of the body). . But now that we know more about how machines, computers, and people work, the animating principle is no longer a mysterious process. We no longer need to involve a soul in explaining the animation process. The actuating cause of an individual life is the brain and the nervous system. Or at least that is the materialist position. If we want to know about the soul we need to know about the brain and all the restrictions that govern its functioning.

What is the relation of the mentapath to the soul?

It would almost be an impossibility to make an exact copy of someone. The reason that it is brought up at all is for a mind experiment. This experiment would be beyond today's scientific methods to carry out. However, it is one that could be logically carried out given certain premises. The theory of a soul or reincarnation has different results than does a identity theory of the mind. A soul or reincarnation could bring with it memories or not, but it is supposed to bring with it a spirit that has some qualities of the original person. That spirit is supposed to be the essence of that person and unique to that person. However, some theories believe that there exists a shared spirit.

?Science has learned, by studying the brain, that there are many qualities about the mind that are not conscious qualities In fact, most activities that occur in the brain we are not conscious of in our mind. The result is that is takes a lot of brain to produce a little mind. It might be possible that more consciousness could be formed in the brain if it we made differently. But it is a probability that other useful but unconscious qualities would be lost.

Religions usually pick the qualities of a spirit that have the greatest allure for attracting or controlling people and then guaranteeing immortality for that spirit if you are a member of that religion.

The concept of a soul is a concept that is not as well defined as a mentapath. In fact, the usual definition of a soul could be many mentapaths. The definition of a soul is one that is so poorly defined that it is not certain what qualities are carried with it. There is usually excess definitional baggage that the mentapath does have to carry, such as uniqueness of the soul in space and time, and linearity of the progression of the soul through time and space. The basic memories, thoughts, abilities, personality, that the mind has are not as important for the soul than it is for the mentapath. It is the continuation of a part of the person that transcends life that is important for the definition of a soul. This is why there can be more than one mentapath that can be called one soul. A soul can cover a very large swath of mentapaths. Consciousness qualities are not necessary the prime request for a soul. A soul can loose all memories of the past. There still has to be a line (entity thing) that ties the soul together through time. This entity the soul follows a path through time. It can change in any way except that it has to be tied together by a path of existence.

Mentapaths

How much can one mentapath change from one time to the next to be called the same mentapath? A mentapath has to be on a line of continuous change to be the same mentapath. There also can be other definitions.

The concept of broadening a mentapath. If we increase any of the aspects of the mentapaths such as intelligence we are broadening the thickness width of the mentapath.

A mentapath can be looked at as a line path through an n - dimensional graph. The line graph has thickness width that corresponds to the swath of mental activity that the brain produces through time. At times it can be wider than others. at any one time we will have a cross section of the mental path that makes a N - dimensional figure. The sequence of how this figure changes through time must be at least one dimension more. Broadening a mentapath corresponds to increasing the mental functioning of a brain that might mean increasing the size and functioning ability of the brain. There are problems with the idea of broadening the mentapaths. First it may be, in some situations, impossible to broaden a narrow minded mentapath and keep the same type of narrow mindedness. It may also be that certain mentapaths would not continue in the same path if they were broadened with out external influence other than experience. The possibilities of mentapaths and all the things that could happen to them is a fascinating subject. We all could look at ourselves as being the same basically and yet broadened in many dimensions in another person or in ourselves. A replay of ourselves but broadened that is what we would what over just a exact copy. We certainly would not want a narrowing of ourselves unless that narrowing saved us suffering. We might want an awareness that we existed before and we are not just a repeat of our old self. That is a concept like a soul that is a continuation of ourselves or our mentapaths. The idea of mentapaths can be like the concept of a soul but there would many mentapaths that could carry on what we would consider our soul. The other thing about a mentapath is that they can be infinitely long.

Mentapaths / civilizations

What would other civilization in the universe do with the information of mentapaths if they were aware of them? Some mentapaths do not care if they live or die or in the case of mentapaths progress. Not necessarily because they don't like life, but because they are not worried about their life or they don’t have the strong survival instinct. There are as many kinds and types of mentapaths that we could possibly think of so what would a higher civilization produce for mentapaths? There would be a strong desire for the mentapaths to survive other wise the mentapaths would not care if the civilization carried on or not and as a result the civilization would not be around for long. The other qualities that mentapaths would instill in themselves is usefulness and nondestructiveness. The mentapaths would affect the civilization and the civilization would affect the mentapaths. Developing mentapaths for a purpose is the same as the educating our children. This is because through education we are modifying human mentapaths to be a certain way and not others. This discussion may seem cold and uncaring but it points out the realities of the situation that our civilization may some day face and not in the so distant future. Although we may not be able to make exact copies of a person we may be able to approximately the making of people to any desired degree of closeness that our science allows us to. And as science and technology becomes more advanced our ability to create complex structures of matter will increase.

Do souls exist?

Souls do not exist but the concept of mentapaths do exist. The concept of a mentapath can function in the same way that a soul does i.e., in tying together mentapaths that encompass peoples lives. The mentapath of a person is usually founded in nothing but because of genes we probably have more to consciousness than nothing in fact we have billion of years of consciousness that in programmed into the genes. It must be kept in mind that with any machine there are always failures and who is to say variety is a failure the need for it may spring up at any instance.

Convergence/ Divergence principle of mentapaths

The human mentapath usually starts as nothing but the developing fetus it continues to develop into a child and further into a grown up it then stays fairly consistence through out life then starts to disintegrate with old age. We can imagine many possible mentapaths and one that continues through time but from one person to another. To get to one point in the same mentapath many people may start and go through many other mentapaths. Many mentapaths can converge onto one mentapath just as many mentapaths can diverge from one mentapath these are called the convergence and divergence principles of mentapaths. These things do not exist within souls. Souls do not converge or diverge onto each other. Souls are supposed to be unique and distinct from each other. They are created not by the world but by a higher being like a god. Once created they exist forever or until they are destroyed by their creator.

Souls as forms of mentapaths

If a soul is defined as certain types of mentapaths then they can exist. But in these situations they will have properties of mentapaths and not of souls except in the boundaries that defined by the soul grouping. What might a soul type grouping of mentapaths be? Within the definition of a soul what could apply to mentapaths One is the mentapaths that think that they have a soul. We can put together an area of colored dots. When looked at together they can become a picture. This is what happens when we get consciousness from the brain the neurons are the dots the picture is the consciousness that is produced. This is a one leveled analogy. It can be applied many times, and it might be that the numerous application of this concept is what produces consciousness. it is feed by on feed by a complex of factors.

Reduction theory

Mentapaths can be constructed by many different physipaths this concept can also apply to parts of physipaths this is also a much more selective and complex process. How can parts of physipaths come together to produce mentapaths? There are two ways to divide physipaths. One in temporally and the other is dimensional. We will assume that a person can produce a complete mentapath. What is a complete mentapath? A person can produce a mentapath. There is also the awareness of the mentapath joining. What is mentapath joining? Any awareness of the mentapath is a current thing, non functioning produces non consciousness, so that a person in suspended animation does not have any awareness.

Consider the situation where physipaths produce mentapaths, the physipaths are different except where they produce the same mentapath or continuing mentapath, a concatenation of parts of the different physipaths will produce a disjointed mentapath. Is this just a strange result or is there more purpose for it. Can some mentapaths only exist as parts of other mentapaths or as parts of physipaths? Restate this as: Is it possible that certain mentapaths can only exist as concatenations of a sequence of different physipaths. How to describe this situation? My mentapath could have been different than it is. At each instance it has many possible paths that it can follow by decisions that I make, or other changes that occur in the body that I can not control (pain discomfort exhaustion) or by the external stimulus that it receives. If we take the situation where there are a number of physipaths that are very close to mine then they will be producing a mentapath that is close to mine if these physipaths are so close that they some times produce the same mentapath, they can also be producing

Concatementapath

There is no causation between what occurs and in the concatenation of the physipath produced mentapaths. Or is there? If it is part of a mentapath then it is part of physipath that does have causation or can effect the world.

The little parts of a mentapath can grow to envelope the rest of the parts of the mentapaths. Like the example of the person that is only going to do be a different mentapath for an hour a day after a while he may decide to do it for a longer period of time and eventually be it all day a possible example is a mediator, that increases his time meditating everyday. He may not be doing it consciously. New term: a concatementapath produced by the concatenation of other mentapaths this mentapaths may not be able to exist from one physipath but is produced by a concatenation of physipaths. It may be a case of a bunch of spots producing a picture. These mentapaths do not have to be in sequence temporally. This mentapath has no causal connection but they may be aware of each other. Imagine a person that at one o'clock thinks about certain thoughts, he know that in that time he is producing a different mentapath because he is radically changing his thought processes that he usually does not use he may begin where he left off the day before producing a continuation of a different mentapaths. This is a well defined example that usually does not exist in my view of reality. Are bursts of creativity a part of a different mentapath that we have. Or when we are happy are we viewing mentapaths that we could have that we want where there is much greater happiness? What would we have if we tied those pieces of happiness together into a mentapath. It may or may not be possible for a physipath to tie together all the different parts of mentapaths that we want. Certain ones my well be possible. It would be nice to tie all the best experiences of our mentapath into one nice mentapath. Maybe that is a good goal for mankind's future. It does not have to be good experiences that we tie together it can be useful experiences and creativity that can be tied together. Of course, is it necessary that we do that? Especially since they can be a concatenation of themselves with out trying themselves together in one body or physipath. The situation is bizarre but it is us and me. If we change me enough we get you and if we change you enough we get me. This is the continuum principle of the mentapaths. That changes in the physipath cause changes in the mentapaths and that there is a continuous or smooth change or can be in some instances and that is something that will need to be investigated through scientific study. Does there exist a physipath that will produce every possible mentapath? Do small changes in the physipath always produce small changes in the mentapath? We can imagine a situation where a single neuron firing causes a tremendous change in the functioning of the brain like an avalanche. One nerve firing causes the entire brain to change a lot. But this is not what I meant what I meant is that small changes in the functioning of the physipath will cause small changes in the mentapath small or short sequences of change in the physipath can cause large changes in the mentapath. We can see this graphed into many different n dimensional mathematical figures graphs. If the mentapath keeps repeating itself over and over then it is like a sin wave. Of course, this repetition can be for different periods of time. The study of mentapaths occupy, consume more of the time of mentapaths than any other thing that mentapaths will do. Because it produces the largest set of knowledge that is important to mentapaths the simplicity is through duplication and generalizations Millions of mentapaths could study one mentapath. An example is that many scholars study one prominent person over their life which is a mentapath and the scholars are in fact mentapaths. The consequences of the study and production of mentapaths has tremendous consequences. We could say that the study of all life is very important that is what many areas of science does. The production of the mentapath is what life is all about. There is the possibility of many mentapaths. What will they all be thinking about? If they are thinking about the same thing then they will be repeating themselves. What area of knowledge is there more information that any other? The answer is that of mentapaths. Complexity will be thinking about complexity. It takes a more complex being to think about a less complex being or part of a more complex being. So the potential different mentapaths will be thinking about other mentapaths or themselves. which are in fact mentapaths. Then there are the mentapaths that study mentapaths that have not existed. But how does one know if a mentapath exists or not or has existed all we can say is that is your reality they don’t seem to exist. How do we know what mentapaths can exist? So what can a mentapath studying mentapaths study? All aspects that inspire that mentapath. I produce a mentapath and I am now studying mentapaths in general. A mentapath studying mentapaths. Many scientists study mentapaths but don't call it that. There is also the mentapath studying mentapaths studying mentapaths. This regression can go indefinitely."I would imagine that like every thing else there are ways of simplifying the study of mentapaths studying mentapaths so they don't have to repeat themselves or reproduce the same mentapath but of course is this bad? there is always the struggle of the mentapaths Luckily we can not control it very well now we certain would mess up. the thing is we are trying to control mentapaths. We have a great deal of success doing it to but not all the success that some people want. Our genes definitely effect our mentapath but so does our environment. we try to change our environment now we will change our genes latter. As we can do both better we will have the .The difference between the soul and the mentapath

The difference between a soul and a mentapath is that a soul is supposed to be unique to a person apart from his experiences In fact the soul does not have to remember all the things that have happened to it over time. Memory is not a quality that is necessary for a soul. Your soul could go to heaven but your memories would be left behind. The soul produces a path through time like a mentapath but it is tied to space and time not consciousness. The soul exists in one place through one period of time. two souls do not exist for one person and people do not share a soul. there rule have and will change as people decide what qualities that a soul has. If a soul were real in the sense that it can be studied like matter and energy the definition would become more exact over time rather than vacillating over time to suit the needs of the religious thinker. The soul is like a person that does not die but exists in a world that transcends the body. This transcending of the body is what allows immortality. Without this soul or transcending substance there is no immortality. The identity theory suggests immortality not of the body but of the mentapath. The mentapath exists apart from the body in that different bodies can produce the same mentapath. The concept is a much more powerful and complex concept than that of the soul. It can offer man much more. It allows an understanding of man and life that a soul cannot. Mentapaths are not just immortal they are eternal. Where there is knowledge there is the possibility of mentapaths. The soul delineates individuality. Mentapaths are a continuum. The theory of mentapaths is a much more complex and beautiful theory than that of souls. Mentapaths allows for higher and higher levels of people that we want to be that have our souls -- that have our awareness, that is us. It also allows a reason for the existence of man a positive existence that gives meaning to man and his existence. A person does not just fade into oblivion forever, or suffer the wrath of a mean god It makes man a part of god in a constructive way. We are here to make gods not to be there puffets. God is the ultimate awareness we are but part of that awareness. No current god has the powers that the ultimate mentapath has"the ultimate mentapath is the mentapath that includes all of the others. The identity theory allows for this. It does not say what is right or wrong only what is possible. A tremendous amount is possible.

People seem to be in their own world when it comes to consciousness. To be conscious of others peoples consciousness one needs to be able to develop a picture of other peoples consciousness within their own consciousness. It is impossible for a conscious person to be conscious of every aspect of their own consciousness. As a result it is even less likely that a person could be totally conscious of other consciousness that are different from his. We can not hope to be fully conscious of others consciousness. If fact we are lucky to be consciousness of any of others consciousness because there are so many possibilities of different consciousness. The consciousness that can perpetuate their own consciousness will be the consciousness that survive. It is possible that a consciousness manipulation of consciousness"will never occur. We have no way to judge at this point what the consciousness of a person really{ is because a person can act out a personality that they really do not posses. But It seems in n order to act out a personality that person has to have and understanding of that acted out personality. There is societal pressures to behave in certain ways. If one group does not act like another or assimilate into another there often is tension. One group does not seem to understand the other group. It also seems that hate is a major force in people. Many times people want to be mad at other people and make little incidents into large ones so they can have a reason for hating. Many times a person is will believe information just for the sake of being mad and hating. If some one is mad it is easier for that person to destroy or kill other people. This may be an a trait that is in the genes of people it allowed people to get mad enough to destroy their neighbors. This might be an evolutionary advantage because it allows that there is more room for your decedents if you kill and destroy your neighbors. On the other hand the is the desire to cooperate because when we cooperate we are more likely to succeed in surviving and reproducing.

Why is the concept of a soul important to people?

Why is the concept of a soul important to people? The reason that the concept of a souls is important to people is that it is the only tie to immortality that most people can see. With out this concept, that there is some aspect of a person that does not die then, man is mortal and when he dies he is gone forever.

How has man come up with such an idea?

How has man come up with the idea of a soul? At times it seems that a person is in some way separate from his body. We can look down at our body when we dream and see our body as if it were some else. We can imagine our body being quite separate from or spirit or soul.

Soulpath

The soulpath is the path of consciousness tied to a religious soul. It does not have to be a specific awarepath or mentapath that can exist in reality it is the awarepath that would be created by the soul in definition. What would be the awarepath of a christian soul a Muslin soul or a hindu soul buddhist soul etc. the religion predicts certain events happening to a person in life and after and before life. When the hindu believes that a person soul goes into the different life forms what does he think that the conscious part or soul is experiencing. Is there any awareness of past lives? It is quit possible that the soul in certain religions is not a continuation of an awarepath at all. That there is another concept involved. We might say the concept of the mepath it is the feeling of me with no remembrance of a past or previous memories.

There are many different types and parts of awarepaths to cover many different concepts of the soul. The soul is not tied to a particular time matter or space. But it is supposed to be singular and linear. a particular part of the soul is tied to a particular part of time and in a particular space using a particular parts of matter. The identity theory says that there can be many different souls exactly alike in space and time and that there is a sharing or parts of soul in different awarepath and mentapaths there is no clear boundaries between souls or different people consciousness.file soulpath Updated 3:12 pm May 18, 1994/ 9:30 am March 16, 1993

Soulpath

The soulpath is a conceptual term. It defines a term that is different from the awarepath different from a person or awarepaducer. We can have a person that is not an awarepaducer. How is this possible? All we need is an object that looks like a person and acts like a person and maybe was produced like people but not be consciousness. and thus produce an awarepath. There may be people that are not consciousness. There are people that live in a different reality. The key concept of a soul path is that There is a thing that ties a persons past to his future through the present. The concept of a soul is not very clear in religion. I guess religious people do not care enough to define it completely or feel that it can nov be understood by people. What needs to be understood by the term soul? Who cares? It matters if we are dealing with immortality and religions. The concept of a soul is a key one when we dwell with religions. The problems with religions is that they do not deal with things scientifically. They really do not care because religion is a power struggle. We are going to define the soulpath. it is more dimensional than the soul for it defines the soul through time. If we define the soulpath as being different from the mentapath or awarepath what is left for it to be? What if we include parts of the awarepath or mentapath in the soul path. How including the physipath also. How about the awarepath and the awarepaducer that can include the awarepath. We also need to include the religious side of an awarepath -- divine experiences etc.

Are there more religious awarepaths or non religious awarepaths are there more of a certain religion. When god created the world why did he produce so many nonreligious awarepaths if he wanted people to be religious? The answer is he did make more nonreligious awarepaths and he doesn't.

What makes a religious awarepath and what makes a non religious awarepath? The belief that a certain religion is correct. Many people do not understand what their religion stands for. Are they still religious? And do they have a religious awarepath. There is behaving religiously and believing religiously. A person can be one the other, both or neither. A person can fight a war but not know why. In the same way a person can believe in a religion and work or fight for that religion and not really know what they are fighting for. a religion is part of a culture and a person can fight for that culture. A religion tells a person what is good and what is right. When that person works for that religion he is working for the right and good. He may and usually never sees the bigger picture. So why are there more non religious awarepaths than religious awarepaths because religions limit awarepaths to a certain belief system. There exist more non religious beliefs systems than religious beliefs systems. If we take one belief system and break it into parts that can be rejoined into new belief systems then we find there are more possibilities than before. The factor theory of beliefs there are x amount of factors that go into a belief system. They can be arranged in any order or grouping. A subset of x we will call y is the set of factors that produce a religious belief system. There has to be a lower limit of the factors that need to be included for a person to be really religious in the correct sense. These factors can come and go through a persons life so he may not be religious all of his life. In fact, no one is ever religious all of their lives consider babies they are not or do not have religious awarepaths.

We know that a person life is limited. We have also seen that the awarepath is eternal but only played out with and awarepaducer. The soul path ties all of these facets together in to a religious concept. Religious people will not say that we can tell god what to do so if he want us to think in terms of the awarepath and awarepaducers he will allow it people may not allow it for people feel threatened by novelty especially philosophical novelty and changes made to religions. The soul is a belief it may not exist but maybe it could be created. In this line of reasoning we are creating a soulpath. sin seems to be a factor is religious souls but the thought of sin or its relation to a soul is tenuous at best. A person is sinful in his thoughts or his actions or both. people can only determine a persons actions not his thoughts Only god can read a person inner thoughts. The soul path is a limited kind of awarepath it is one where an awarepath thinks that he is a person and he has a soul even if that soul is not understood. He believes in a god that is related to the soul in some way. Of course it is possible to think of a awarepath that believes in souls but does not believe in a god. This awarepath believes in a soul that is independent from the body in some ways and doesn’t die when the person body dies. This belief that the awarepath produces is such that he believe that there will be consciousness alter the body dies but in a different form. It is possible to imagine an awarepath experiencing a different kind of reality even if there is not a connection of the awarepath to reality. The after life section of the awarepath is such that a transformation occurs and life seems different to the awarepath. of course there are all sorts of possibilities here. different religions purpose different theories about an after life. The awarepath thinks that the after life is more important than the during life experiences so he plans for the after life by certain rituals and actions. The soul path can stop at the death of the person. However there can be a situation where there is more to the awarepath. All the ideas have been ideas of the after life from the before death awarepath. Anything can happen to this awarepath after"the death of the body or the awarepath belief in the death. The awarepath at this stage can have exactly what it thinks will happen to it after death. there are many possibilities here for there are many theories of an after life and what it is like. How are these after life awarepaths possible? first, the universe produces them randomly. Second, a conscious being creates them deliberately. And third that we humans advance to the point that we can do it ourselves. For religious people This is not against god will any more than growing a garden. It is some we can do that god allows us to do. Any reality that we imagine we can thus produce in an awarepaducer. Why we may want to there are may reasons for it Just to study it is one for religious people it is an actualization of a religious promise. We might say that we do it out of kindness for past generations

How does a soulpath end? It can go on forever but it will be cyclic for finite people unless one person trans forms into other people over time to create every possibility.

What is may general philosophy? Awarepaducers can produce many possibilities or realities and these awarepaths are real in themselves even if not real toward a reality. Reality becomes important when we have to worry about supporting the awarepaths and keeping them going. This might be one reason why religious people might want to help support research into awarepaths because they may be the only way to keep the religion going. in a world dominated by science. We can not know what level of reality we are in we can only call the level we are in level one and create realities within awarepaducers of two and three etc. If we find that we are in fact in a reality producer or awarepaducer we call it level 0 or negative one -1. Many of the things that we think are real or not real can be created in a reality producer or awarepaducer. Ultimately we may be many levels away from reality and the real way that the universe works on the other hand we may be in reality. WE have limited ability to grasp this reality It is more complex than we are we are then forced to see what we can do with this reality and to create awarepaducers that are more intelligent and more consciousness than we are They will be able to correspond to reality better than we can. This we need to strive for. If e are in reality then we can also fall and never regain the position that we presently have. Dogmatic systems of belief will or can destroy our progress by limiting the awarepaths that we allow. This process can be limiting because people thought can not be monitored by a non scientific community. And they can never become scientific if they limit ideas by being dogmatic. Will reality that we know sustain higher life forms that are better scientists. It will with problems. These problems can be bad but they can be the sign that leads us into new ideas and learning. The goal is to create all knowledge or be aware of it. It is to produce or understand all awarepaths and all possible realities. We do this by considering all possibilities. And organizing all possibilities into all possible simplifying systems. WE have to create higher life forms that can do these things. These higher life form will be us only better. does ones love of Is ones love of god so great as to be willing to create him? We are god so when we create him we will be creating us. only better. What theory do I believe in I believe in all of them because all of them have merit however not all of them equally solve problems. Which ones then do we use? We can not know anything for sure so how do we know what will work and what will not work? We use the scientific method. Of using what seems to work and modifying things when it does not work. We have to observe and be willing to try things. Maybe it does work when we think that it does not work. My philosophy is that there are ways to do things and to simply things and to create things and theories so that we can change in ways that we plan. There can be a science of epistemology that can help us solve our problems like science has but a meta science that can create many sciences.

GLOSSARY

Soulpath, the path of the soul through time defined in terms of the identity theory and awarepaths, persons, and awarepaducers.