Superimmortality, morality, and well being 4

Superimmortality, morality, and well being

Sometimes morality is considered to be what creates the most well being for conscious beings

What is well being for a person that has only one limited length life? What does well being mean for a person that has only one limited length life?

Is suffering always bad? How much depression, fear and suffering is allowed before a life to be considered not worth living? At any point in a life it seems that it could be better so if you only have one life to live then there is or can be the hope that things can be better in the future. For superimmortality this can apply to other lives no matter how bad a life is other lives can continue and be much better. At any point of a terrrible life there can be the divergence of a better life is endless amounts of ways. Is one goal of conscious beings to make divergences of awarepath that are bad into good ones in other bodies?

What is well being if superimmortality is true? What is well being for a person that has the potential for many different lives? What does well being mean for a person that has the potential for many different lives?

Could it be that the awfulness of conscious existence is not so bad when there can be many different lives

What is well being if you do not know how the principles of superimmortality effects your ixperiencitness over all of time and space?

If superimmortality is true and there are other bodies that will produce the same ixperiencitness in the future, the end of a terrible life is much better than the continuation of horrible life.

What is well being if all awarepaths are created for each ixperiencitness grouping? Not only can all the awarepaths be created for an ixperiencitness grouping they can be repeated and modified. Of course, modified awarepaths are just part of the awarepaths in an ixperiencitness grouping.

What is morality if you cause your own suffering in other bodies that are producing your ixperiencitness?

Death would not be considered well being if you only have one life to live. Death is not so bad if there is the possibility of having other lives as superimmortality predicts is a real possibility.

Morality considering death, is going to be somewhat different between the belief that death is final and death is not final.

There is more to it than that because you have control to varying degrees to your death and life again.

There is a trade off between suffering and extending a person life. Is well being of a person different when they can consciously exist again after death.

Some religions believe that you can (should) suffer now for greater rewards later after death increasing your chances of going to heaven and decreasing your risk of going to hell. The problem is how do you actually know what are the right behaviors that are more likely to lead to better after death consequences. Superimmortality also predicts that some sacrifice now can increase the likelihood that you can consciously exist again in the future. And some work now will increase the likelihood of better awarepaths with your ixperiencitness existing in the future. A third aspect is the enhancement of the self and the awarepaths that have your ixperiencitness. The fourth consideration is working toward the production of percentage wise identical ixperiencitnesses. Religions can ask for great sacrifice in this life for great rewards in an after life. Superimmortality does not have to demand anything. It might be better to suffer less until we know more of the likelihood of an ixperiencitness existing again in the future.

What are some possibilities concerning ixperiencitness occurrences

   1. How many people on earth have your identical ixperiencitness at the present time?
   2. How many people have had your identical ixperiencitness in the past?
   3. How many people will have your identical ixperiencitness in the future?
   4. How many people have a percentage wise identical ixperiencitness to your now?
   5. What percentage wise identical ixperiencitness to our own should we care about? 
   6. How many people will or did have a percentage wise identical ixperiencitness to yours?
   7. Types of enhancement.

Possibilities for improving awarepaths in an ixperiencitness grouping:

   1. When is working toward making awarepaths better in the future bad?
   2. When is working toward making more awarepaths in the future bad? When more awarepaths existing at one time make the existing awarepath a lot worse.
   3. Enhancement of awarepaths in an ixperiencitness grouping. types of enhancements:
   4. Creating new types of experiences that reality can not, like within awarepaducers.

Superimmortality predicts that in some cases you can suffer more now to make life better after death.

Should you suffer more now to increase the likelihood that you will exist again in the future? Should you work more now to increase the likelihood that you will exist again in the future?

Should you sacrifice well being now for the increased possibility of existing again in the future?

Should you sacrifice well being now for the increased possibility of having a better life or lives in the future?

It would appear that well being is increased in this life when there knowledge that there can be conscious existence again after death

What promotes well being is what is moral

If superimmortality promotes well being then superimmortality is moral.

Greater knowledge can direct work and effort to be more productive toward positive awarepaths production.

Work toward a positive goals can give purpose and meaning to conscious existence.