THEOFACT

file theofact 8:50 am October 13, 1994/1:16 pm March 6, 1994

Theofacts

There are many theories that will satisfy facts. A few facts do not determine a particular theory. This is the same analogy as a few points on a line do not determine a function. Any theory that is based on reality will contain an infinite amount of factual points. As a result we can not determine any theory from any set of facts.

Theocepts can be considered like points on an epistemological continuum.

Theofact is a fact that fits a theory. in an infinite domain there will be an infinite amount of theories that fit a finite amount of facts. What is the proof of this? We can construct a theory where there is only a finite amount of facts that are in it thus there will be only a

Lets give examples; Lets examine the theory of evolution. The basic idea for evolution is that species can change over time. They change due to changes in the genetic material due to mutations due to any source that changes the genetic material like radiation, viruses, emergent chemical behavior, (What is emergent behavior? It is the unlikely chemical reactions that can occur when many or unusual chemicals comes together in a situation that produces unlike chemicals or dna structures) etc. The third part of the theory of evolution is that these changes that lead to a disadvantage in the perpetuation of these genes and biological organism will lead to a decline in that change and any that increase that reproduction of that change will become more likely to exist. What is proof of the theory of evolution? There are many parts of different theories that can go to support the theory. a theory in itself has to be evolutionary as well. Theories that can not perpetuate themselves change or die out as well. We do not need proof to believe and perpetuate a theory. What d owe need to perpetuate a theory. Written information about the theory is important. but a theory can be passed down verbally and can change over time. What is a theory an explanation is a theory. a device that predicts future event is a theory. A theory can even predict past events if the facts are not already known. Even if they are the theory can predict that in fact it was different that we have thought. A religion that predicts or explains how the world was formed is a theory. We can have theories about anything. What is a fact that goes toward proving a theory. First no set of facts can prove a theory, nor can beliefs no matter how intense the belief it can not prove a theory. There are awarepaths that can not accept this concept or theory or fact, and there are ones that can not understand it. It would seem that if we can not be certain of any theory or fact then how can we be certain of this one. The answer is we can't be certain of this as well. If we can not be certain of the theory that we can not be certain of anything then it would be possible that we could know something. Which means that the theory may well be true that we can know anything for certain. Just because we can never know that there are correct theories out there that does not mean that there are not correct theories and incorrect theories. We just can not know for certain. What about the case where there is a person and he knows something and believes that he can know something and that something is in fact true? We do not want to limit the possibilities that might exist. Since we can not know anything for certain we should consider all possibilities. But all possibilities are infinitely infinite and we are but finite creatures and can not deal with all possibilities. We can however deal with many ways to simplify this information about theories. There are an infinite amount of numbers but that does not keep us from dealing with the concept of infinities or parts of infinite systems. If we can not prove that something or theory is correct we can not prove that it is incorrect either. However we can have a theory that labels other theories as valid or not and why we want or need this to be the case. When we deal with a theory we need to have reasons that a theory is included or not in the grand theory. We may not have any reason for the inclusion or exclusion of certain ideas of theories in another. We however, need to state the information that is valid in our reasoning. A statement does not have to be complicated or long to convey this information. We can use a statement like all x type theocepts or theories are excluded because of Q. Infinite systems can be finite in many epistemological ways. We call them one demensionally infinite concept or theory. Numbers are finite in many epistemological realms so that we can deal with it in certain ways. One of the simplest simplifiers is a name. But it is possible to construct epistemological theories that do not have names because the name is connected to the concept in some way that make it un nameable. It is an infiniteable complex name.

Differentials and theocepts

Theocepts can be differentiated in relationship to other theocepts and the answer will be a theocept. They can also be differentiated in relationship to time and other specific concepts.

We can represent them as d[T]/d[t]= where d[T] is the change of the theocept and d[t] is the change in time. the result can be of course anything depending on what the theocept is. This equation is a mathematical equation when d[T] is a normal equation in mathematics. d[t] is the change in time usually a smooth change but this is not necessary because there can be many types of time and thus many types of change in time. d[t]/

We can also represent the equation d[A]/d[B] where A and B are two different theocepts. In this case we have the situation where we have a theocept produced where it represents the change of one theocept in relationship to another. One example would be the change in the awarepath with the change in the physipath. We can write this as d[AW]/d[PH]= An equation like this would hold a lot of information. We can also define the equation d[AP]/d[PP] which means the change of the awarepoint in relation to the change in the physipoint. Since the real world is much more complex than a mere equation we need theocepts to represent them.

Any mathematical idea or concept can be applied to theocepts, and theocepts can also be reduced to any mathematical concept

The concept of emergent theocepts

We can create species of theocepts and ways to generate these theocepts and name them. WE can produce emergent theocepts about the theocept that we deal with. There many be theories of theocepts that do not exist anywhere else in the theocept that we produce that represent nature and other topics. We certainly have theocepts about theocepts. They will have their own logic that controls their behavior. That logic can be radically different than any other type of logic that we have seen. This then will be an emergent property of theocepts. These emergent property will or can be represented by other theocept and these new theocepts will be emergent theocepts. Just by combing different theocepts in different ways we can get new or emergent theocepts. We might get new theocepts by relating them in new ways that produce new and emergent theocepts. How many ways are there to represent a theocept to make them easier to use in different circumstances? These new ways can produce emergent theocepts.

Theopoints, theolines, and theocontinuums

A theopoint is a theocept that can be represented on a theocontinuum. A theoline is the sequence of theocepts or theopoints that can go to represent a line. These can be of all sorts in all different number of dimensions. The continuum can be created in many way to show change over a distance. A theopoint can be a theofact that can support a theory. The theoline is like a theory. We make the theofacts fit the theoline. in many theocontinuums a finite number of theofacts will not uniquely determine the theoline or theory. moment in the theocontinuum will represent change in the theory. So a theopoint will be one of many possible ways that it could be. a fossil could be used as a theofact of theopoint. A fossil can be represented as a theocept because there can be a great deal of information that concerns that fossil. Lets give an example of all the possible facts or knowledge about the fossil. There is the obvious like it age and composition but then there is all sorts of other information of why it got where it is. But we can also have information about its awarepath and the awarepaths around it. Its past dna composition. The environment of where it lived. Not all of this information is important for being a theofact for some theoline or theory. The distilled information that specifically supports or does not support a theory can be represented in a theocept also. It is called a theofactor It is the information of a theocept or knowledge about an object that supports a particular theory different parts of a theocept can support different theories. What do we have when we have a theofactor that does support contradictory theories? A theory has to be produced that supports this contradiction without. What if no theory can support this contheofactor or contheofact?

A contheofact is a theofact that can be used in contradictory theories. but not as a neutral fact or netheofact, netheofactor which can support either or any relevant theory with out producing a contradiction or paradox.

Glossary

Theofact, a fact in a theory that proves or disproves it ar can be used as proof.

Theofactor, the relevant part of the theofact that is used to prove or disprove a theory. It is a simitheocept of the theofact.

Theofact, a theocept that is used or can be used as a fact in a theory

Contheofact, a theofact that proves contradictory to a theory

Contheofactor, the part of the theofact that is contradictory to the theory.

Netheofactor, a neutral theofactor or one that does not prove contradictory or paradoxical to a theory

Netheofact,

Theoline, a line made of theopoints in a theocontinuum.

Theopoint,

Theocontinuum, a continuum of theocepts

Theofactinuum, a theocontinuum where the theocepts are theofacts or theofactors

Theoceptinuum,