TIEPATH

file tiepaths 11:37 am Nov 6, 1994/10:00 am Dec 12, 1992

Tiepaths

Topics to cover

What is a tiepath? Why are they important to this theory and to religion and society? Do tie paths mean that there are not an infinite amount of tiepaths? Can there be an infinite amount of tie paths? What level of infinite tiepaths? What kind of tiepaths are there?

Tiepaths are mental paths that tie together paths of consciousness or awarepaths. There are many kinds of tiepaths and of all sorts of complexity. There are all sorts of kinds of awareness, things and awarepaths to be aware of, so there are all sorts of different tiepaths. One example of tiepaths are ones that tie together different levels of human history. These are historical tiepaths Then there are individual tiepaths. They tie together individual awarepaths through time or through space. Then there are temporal tiepaths they tie together one awarepath over a length or time span. It ties together parts of the same awarepath.

Any grouping of awarepathic concepts can be brought together by a tiepath.

One reason that we name all the different types of awarepaths is to distinguish the different ones. Chemistry has a name for each different chemical so we should have a name for different types of awarepath or consciousness. We may not be able to tell what type of awarepath any particular person has but we will know what kind they could have. And I suspect that we will use these term in relation to how people seemed to have behaved in the past or could behave in the future. The sciences that deal with epistemology and consciousness will be more complex than all the other sciences. One reason is that all the sciences are just a small part of epistemology. And consciousness is an open ended field of understanding because it can become evermore complex. its complexity is based on the complexity of all the other sciences plus the complexity of consciousness.

Examples of tiepaths

Histotiepath, Historical tiepaths these tiepaths tie together awarepaths that exist in different historical periods. These would have to be one directional because if a historical person experiences the modern then he is modern but a modern person can experience the past because they can be aware of it without changing the past or the present. It seems that it would be harder for a historical awarepath to experience more modern things than it is for modern awarepath to experience. Of course it would not be easy for a modern to live in the past environment because there would be many problems that he might not be used to. So what are some of the possible blending? One blending is that of memories. A modern awarepath can have memories of the past as if he in fact was there. like a person going back in a time machine and experiencing the past and then bringing back those memories. Another Is the living in both worlds at the same time. In this case It would appear that it would take two full brains to corresponds to the two different worlds and then a connector that ties the worlds into a whole. It would take a higher level of processing. Tempotiepath this path ties concepts along the same awarepath. It can tie together different parts on the same path so that a person can experience what it was like to be young and older at the same time. It allows for experiences that are only memories to be reexperienced. Contiepaths are awarepaths that tie together awarepaths that have different concepts. This can be different world views, politics, etc. It can also be more than one concept. it can also tie into an awarepath a concept or experience. Of course if we tie together a concept into a awarepath we are not tieing together awarepaths. But his concept may be a pure simiawarepath and not a whole awarepath. These would be called simitiepaths.

Why will tiepath exist? Certain senpaths can produce limited tiepaths. For instance a good war movie can produce in a person a modified awarepath that is relating to the experiences that could have happened in a war. Why should tiepaths exist? Are tiepaths natural or artificially made?

Imagine going back in time and having to be a soldier in world war 1 and then coming back to the present. Your awarepath would be modified by those experiences. But what about the integration of a soldier awarepath in that war with yours? One example is that of creating a different senpath and the other is the integration of the two awarepaths. There would be many ways to integrate the two awarepaths and one might be with a senpath. The other would be the creation of a new physipath that produces the integration of the two within itself. By integrating the different awarepaths it seems that many could be disjointed with no meaning. It is possible that physipaths can be produced that do not produce a coherent picture or consciousness. It would seem that many would not produce a coherent picture. This would bring up two more terms coherent awarepath, simicoherent awarepath, and the incoherent awarepath. It seems that there are all types of awarepaths in people because there are crazy people and partially crazy people. This means that there are crazy awarepaths. There are probably many ways that awarepaths can be disturbed. One way is for the awarepath to jump to disjointed paths so that reality looses its cohesiveness. The brain among other things determines what a person is, where he is going, and where he is coming from. He makes calculation to the extent of his present awarepath and what that path can do or has done. If disjointed awarepaths can be or are crazy. It seems that every person has spells of disjointedness where our awarepaths are not a clean continuum. Every human awarepath is somewhat crazy so what is a perfect awarepath or non disjointed awarepath? Call it a pure awarepath. Is a person by definition a tiepath because he ties together many aspects of reality into one awarepath but that awarepath seems disjointed because it is not complex enough to deal with all of reality? Can one awarepath deal with all of reality? Maybe reality can be limited. Maybe that is why people are narrow minded so that they can have a awarepath that is not so disjointed with the complexities of reality? This might be one of the reasons that people are religious so that they do not have to deal with the complexities of reality. It disjoints their reality and they can no longer function. Functioning means taking care of personal and family survival. If this is the case then we can not replace one religion with no religion we have to replace one religion with another one that they can comprehend but is not so complex that they can not understand it or interferes with their life. or that it disjoints their awarepath more than reality already does. The way to convert people is not to change the awarepath that are mature but to teach the immature people that still can form new connections. How do you get the old religious people to let their children be taught a new religion. Gradually or drastically religions change to the needs and wants of the people. As peoples senpaths change their religions or beliefs must change to adapt if it does not then gradually the situation becomes like an unresponsive government and there is a revolution.

When we consider the binding problem how do ideas get tied together? They get tied together but the change that is occurring in the brain. We first have a sequence of mental events that are ties together by a different set of mental events. If there were no change there would be no mentality or consciousness so that the change that occurs in the brain is what ties together the consciousnesses. Why don't we have a picture of this in our brain? We go to one fluid set of ideas to another. But we have recall of the sequence of these ideas even if these are not very exact or reliable. If the brain is monitoring the rest of the brain and records in a way what it wants, the memories that it has, then the consciousness that we have or the binding of the consciousness that we have is We do not know what types of mental functioning produces consciousness and which don't. It may be specific types of mental monitoring that produces consciousness. and if this type of feed back does not exist then there is no consciousness. given that this is the case then what types of consciousness will we have if we change this process of mental monitoring or increase or decrease it? Will we have a new type of consciousness or will we have an expanded consciousness or both? The concept of simiawarepath is relevant there because if it takes the whole of the physipath to make the parts of the awarepaths It may be that the brain on the same circuits produce the different types of consciousness or the different awarepaths.

Glossary of terms

Tiepath, is an awarepath that ties together differences between awarepaths

Histotiepath, these tiepaths tie together historical perspectives of awarepaths.

Inditiepath, these tiepaths tie together individual people and there differences.

Tempotiepath, this tiepath ties together one awarepath at different sections along the awarepath.

Anitiepath, the tie path between different animals like humans and dolphins.

Simitiepaths, are simiawarepaths tied together or a simiawarepath and a awarepath tied together.

Contiepath, are a concept tied into an awarepath.