Types of immorality

file: Types of immorality

Awaretheory complicates the issues of morality and immortality. Awaretheory can start the study of morality with the concept of all of the possible ways that matter can produce consciousness. It then divides these possible ways into groups with the same ixperiencitness. Then again it divides these into groups that can be produced randomly and naturally, with those that can be produced only by deliberate conscious means. Each physipath has a degree that it effects reality and other consciousnesses. The same awarepath can be produced by many differnt physipaths and each physipath can effect reality in various ways and amounts. The same awarepaths can be produced by a physipath that is both moral and immoral. We can also talk about awaresections strung together that are both morally good and bad.

Should immoral awarepaths be punished when the same awarepath can also be tied to one or more moral physipath? Isn't punishment immoral when it leads to suffering for no reason? Punishment is the creating or allowing to exist of awarepaths, awaresections, or awaremoments to exist that no conscious being of a particular ixperiencitness wants to experience. When you create an awarepath the ixperiencitness that the awarepath is included in is effected. How does this happen when we are not aware of all that we can experience in terms of awarepaths? For example, if you were severely punished like tortured in your past part of your present life but no effects of that punishment can be found in your body, so there is no memory or conscious effects of these events, how does this matter to you, if the event also did not produce an effect on anything else that will eventually effect you?

Past events in an awarepath may or may not have negative effects on the present part of the awarepath even if both parts of the awarepath have the same ixperiencitness. The same can be said about different awarepaths that have the same ixperiencitnesses. So how can the actual existence of bad awarepaths, awaresections, or awaremoments, make a difference from the potential existence of bad awarepaths, awaresections, or awaremoments? The difference has to have a different effect on consciousness through or by way of the structure and functioning of matter. One way is through the realization of the suffering itself in other awarepaths. Some awarepaths will or can know the difference between actual and potential suffering awarepaths. Though they may not experience the suffering themselves or have been effected in anyway by the suffering. They can know and recreate this and many other cases of bad awarepaths at any time in the present or future. A sensepath that causes suffering can be applied to any point on any physipath at any time randomly or on purpose. There is another kind of sensepath or externapath that can be applied to any physipoint along any physipath at any present or future time it can be called a negative memory refresher sensepath. It is not only knowledge of the past painful events but it creates actual painful memories of the event. The negative events do not have to actually have happen yet or even ever happen for this to occur. You never know for certain what kind of situation you are in, or what is producing the current consciousness that you are experiencing and for what reasons you are experiencing what you are experiencing even though you may have good reasons to believe what you do.

How is it possible that the same awarepath can be both immoral and not immoral at the same. First awaretheory shows that there are many different ways that an awarepath can be produced. Second, the same awarepath can have different effects on reality. Third, different realities may have or even need different morals. Morals can often be goal driven. For instance, to satisfy some god or religion, or for some social or evolutionary goal or need.

Awarepaths are bad or good depending on the view point of awarepaths.

Fairness takes on a different meaning when the ideas of awaretheory are applied. The ideas that awaretheory proposes allows for the universe to be a very fair place. How is this possible if people and other conscious beings die after suffering much more than other people or conscious beings? What conditions would be required for there to be cosmic fairness? If there are no conscious experiences or conscious existence after death as many people believe then the universe appears unfair. If there is life after death but of a limited nature as many people believe there is no guarantee of fairness either. There is no guarantee that there is nature, god, or gods that are fair either. What makes fairness? We have to have consciousness for there to even be the concept of fairness. None conscious objects do not care about fairness. Conscious thought determines fairness or unfairness for other conscious beings and other objects or none conscious life forms.

The first way that awaretheory shows how the universe is fair is that it shows that life after death for most conscious beings is possible and possibly even likely. But it can also not occur for some as well. Awaretheory has a much more complex theory of life after death than any other theory. Consequently, fairness is much more complex as well. Life after death does not give us fairness if each life after life after death is still considered unfair. Awaretheory introduces the concept of ixpereicnitness. Without the ixperiencitness concept there is no way to tie together different people in a meaningful way for understanding life after death. If you can not tie people together then there is no real fairness either. The ixperiencitness] concept ties you together in this life with your body. The ixperiencitness concept can tie you to other bodies as well. Other bodies that have your ixperiencitness can have better lives. Unfair situations and lives can be made more fair by having other better lives that you will experience when they get created. Every life has better and worse times. Awaretheory predicts that every life has better and worse lives that have the same ixperiencitness. Each unfair live can be countered with any number of positive lives. This does not have to be tied to the randomness of nature or the fickleness of a god. It can be based on the good decisions that you and future versions of you make.

See also: Fairness and awaretheory