Cidentireplica paradox

Cidentireplica paradox or cid paradox is the when the physapath and behaviorpath produced by cidentireplicas have a different awarepaths than their original produces. In the cid paradox there is some degree of disconnect between the behavior that is produced and the conscious that the conscious being is experiencing. When the behaviorpath does not match the awarepath closely enough it will appear to the consciousness produced by the body that he does not control the body. The behavior in each cidentireplica is identical by definition or consequence of them all having the same physapath. This appears to give proof that they produce the same consciousness or awarepath. But if the cidentireplicas produce a consciousness that is different than the consciousness of their original, the cidentireplica may be wanting to do or say one thing but they do or say another thing instead. For example, the original is thirsty and gets a drink of water. The cidentireplica is not thirsty but because his behavior is the same as the original's he gets a drink of water anyway and them wonders why he did that behavior rather than a behavior that he really wanted like getting a sandwich. If each different cidentireplica produces a different consciousness than the original they will also produce a different consciousness or awarepath from each other. Another cidentireplica will get a drink of water but want to turn on the TV instead. Another will want to continue to sit. There are numerous divergent awarepaths that cidentireplicas could produce different from each other and from the original that has the same physapath. Once the cidentireplica realizes that he is not controlling his actions it would appear that he would want to express this information out loud out of frustration. But of course he can not because his behavior is the same as the originals and not the behavior that he wants to control and produce. Although the behavior difference may be very small and not noticed by the cidentireplica to begin with in many cases it will be noticed and then avalanche into a very different consciousness than the original's. The ixperiencit theory of consciousness predicts that because of the problems with the cid paradox, it is more reasonable, simpler, and predictive that cidentireplicas of the original will produce the same awarepaths as the original does.

A second aspect of the cid paradox is that the same physapath is producing a different awarepath. Since there can be any number of different cidentireplicas of an original the question becomes will the awarepath of each cidentireplica be different from each other and why? Can this difference be predicted by physical properties? For example, will idoriginal produce the same awarepath as the original? If an idoriginal produces the same awarepath as the original but a cidentireplica does not, and there can be constructed a continuum of variation between a idoriginal and a cidentireplica in how they are created, at what point in this continuum does the part idoriginal part cidentireplica produce the same awarepath and why at this point and no other?

It then seems that only the original's behavior would exactly match the consciousness produced by the body, all other cidentireplicas awarepaths would eventually diverge.

One might argue that this problem or type of experiment will never be produced because the body of a conscious being is so complex that it can never be recreated with the exactness of a cidentireplica. Even though these experiments may not be accomplishable does not mean that there is no answer to the questions that they help solve. We can also do what scientists and mathematicians frequently do and that is approximate the experiment. This means studying the videntireplicas of originals. A videntireplica can be imagined to be as closely identical to the original as one likes. For example, like a difference of one extra neutron (an isotope) in one atom, in one molecule, in one cell, in the whole body. A change like this can be so slight that there is no consequential divergence in the physapath ever.

See also: Original paradox, Idoriginal paradox, Coriginal paradox, Cidentireplica paradox, Cid paradox, Videntireplica paradox, Vid paradox, Fidentireplica paradox, Isoidentireplica paradox, Bioidentireplica paradox, Enhaidentireplica paradox, Insidentireplica paradox, Musidentireplica paradox, Nrgidentireplica paradox, Tridentireplica paradox, Comboidentireplica paradox, Simidentireplica paradox, Itoidentireplica paradox,

Original paradox argument, Idoriginal paradox argument, Coriginal paradox argument, Cidentireplica paradox argument, Cid paradox argument, Videntireplica paradox argument, Vid paradox argument, Fidentireplica paradox argument, Isoidentireplica paradox argument, Bioidentireplica paradox argument, Enhaidentireplica paradox argument, Insidentireplica paradox argument, Musidentireplica paradox argument, Nrgidentireplica paradox argument, Tridentireplica paradox argument, Comboidentireplica paradox argument, Simidentireplica paradox argument, Itoidentireplica paradox argument,

Fazcontinuum paradox argument, Fazcontinuum paradox, neuropath continuum paradox argument, physapath continuum paradox argument, physipath continuum paradox argument, neuropath continuum paradox, physapath continuum paradox, physipath continuum paradox

awaretheory, superimmortality, science of superimmortality, superatheism, ixperiencit theory of consciousness