Difference between revisions of "Fazcontinuum paradox"
(Created page with "{{See also: itoidentireplica paradox}}") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | The [[fazcontinuum]] paradox is the basis for the [[fazcontinuum paradox argument]]. A [[physacontinuum]] can be imagined constructed where every possible [[physapath]] is contained in it. This physacontinuum, for simplicity sake, can be limited to physapaths that are created by human bodies. It can be made even smaller by taking just a [[physaregion]] of this resulting physacontinuum. Each [[human physapath]] will correspond to, and produce a [[human behaviorpath]]. Because physapaths can be so closely alike, many different physapaths will produce the same behaviorpath. As a consequence the [[behaviorcontinuum]] will be smaller in size than the physacontinuum by many magnitudes. The paradox comes about when Identical and closely identical physapaths do not produce the same [[awarepaths]]. We can now imagine another physacontinuum made of the replicas of the physapaths in the first continuum. It will [[fazmap]] to the first physacontinuum's [[behaviorcontinuum]]. But if [[identical physapaths]] do not produce [[identical awarepaths]] then the second physacontinuum will have to fazmap to an entirely different [[awarecontinuum]]. this different awarecontinuum will still fazmap to the same behaviorcontinuum. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
{{See also: itoidentireplica paradox}} | {{See also: itoidentireplica paradox}} | ||
Revision as of 06:28, 6 April 2016
The fazcontinuum paradox is the basis for the fazcontinuum paradox argument. A physacontinuum can be imagined constructed where every possible physapath is contained in it. This physacontinuum, for simplicity sake, can be limited to physapaths that are created by human bodies. It can be made even smaller by taking just a physaregion of this resulting physacontinuum. Each human physapath will correspond to, and produce a human behaviorpath. Because physapaths can be so closely alike, many different physapaths will produce the same behaviorpath. As a consequence the behaviorcontinuum will be smaller in size than the physacontinuum by many magnitudes. The paradox comes about when Identical and closely identical physapaths do not produce the same awarepaths. We can now imagine another physacontinuum made of the replicas of the physapaths in the first continuum. It will fazmap to the first physacontinuum's behaviorcontinuum. But if identical physapaths do not produce identical awarepaths then the second physacontinuum will have to fazmap to an entirely different awarecontinuum. this different awarecontinuum will still fazmap to the same behaviorcontinuum.
See also: Original paradox, Idoriginal paradox, Coriginal paradox, Cidentireplica paradox, Cid paradox, Videntireplica paradox, Vid paradox, Fidentireplica paradox, Isoidentireplica paradox, Bioidentireplica paradox, Enhaidentireplica paradox, Insidentireplica paradox, Musidentireplica paradox, Nrgidentireplica paradox, Tridentireplica paradox, Comboidentireplica paradox, Simidentireplica paradox, Itoidentireplica paradox,
- Original paradox argument, Idoriginal paradox argument, Coriginal paradox argument, Cidentireplica paradox argument, Cid paradox argument, Videntireplica paradox argument, Vid paradox argument, Fidentireplica paradox argument, Isoidentireplica paradox argument, Bioidentireplica paradox argument, Enhaidentireplica paradox argument, Insidentireplica paradox argument, Musidentireplica paradox argument, Nrgidentireplica paradox argument, Tridentireplica paradox argument, Comboidentireplica paradox argument, Simidentireplica paradox argument, Itoidentireplica paradox argument,
- Fazcontinuum paradox argument, Fazcontinuum paradox, neuropath continuum paradox argument, physapath continuum paradox argument, physipath continuum paradox argument, neuropath continuum paradox, physapath continuum paradox, physipath continuum paradox
awaretheory, superimmortality, science of superimmortality, superatheism, ixperiencit theory of consciousness
