Difference between revisions of "Fazcontinuum paradox"

Latest revision as of 20:47, 6 April 2016

The fazcontinuum paradox is the basis for the fazcontinuum paradox argument. A physacontinuum can be imagined constructed where every possible physapath is contained in it. This physacontinuum, for simplicity sake, can be limited to physapaths that are created by human bodies. It can be made even smaller by taking just a physaregion of this resulting physacontinuum. Each human physapath will correspond to, and produce a human behaviorpath. Because physapaths can be so closely alike, many different physapaths will produce the same behaviorpath. As a consequence the behaviorcontinuum will be smaller in size than the physacontinuum by many magnitudes. The paradox comes about when identical and closely identical physapaths do not produce the same awarepaths. because the set of physapath is much larger than the set of behaviorpath many different physapaths will be producing the same behaviorpath. But since it is stipulated that every physapath produces a different awarepath, then many different awarepaths will fazmap to each behaviorpath. This is not a big problem if all of the awarepaths that fazmap to each behaviorpath are very closely alike because there does not have to be an awareness within the awarepath that he does not control his behavior. But if there is a large enough difference in the desired behavior of the awarepath and the produced behavior of the physapath then divergence of the awarepaths can become very large because the consciousness that corresponds to the awarepath can test control over it body in many different ways finding that he does not control it and being aware of it in an ever increasing way. But the problem gets worse because each awarepath can not converge into each other or they will be identical for at least a period of time.

We can now imagine another physacontinuum made of the replicas of the physapaths in the first continuum. It will fazmap to the first physacontinuum's behaviorcontinuum. But if identical physapaths do not produce identical awarepaths then the second physacontinuum will have to fazmap to an entirely different awarecontinuum. This different awarecontinuum will still fazmap to the same behaviorcontinuum. Now there are even more awarepaths fazmapping to the same set of behaviorpaths.

There are a limited amount of human awarepaths eventually all of them will be used up.

See also: Original paradox, Idoriginal paradox, Coriginal paradox, Cidentireplica paradox, Cid paradox, Videntireplica paradox, Vid paradox, Fidentireplica paradox, Isoidentireplica paradox, Bioidentireplica paradox, Enhaidentireplica paradox, Insidentireplica paradox, Musidentireplica paradox, Nrgidentireplica paradox, Tridentireplica paradox, Comboidentireplica paradox, Simidentireplica paradox, Itoidentireplica paradox,

Original paradox argument, Idoriginal paradox argument, Coriginal paradox argument, Cidentireplica paradox argument, Cid paradox argument, Videntireplica paradox argument, Vid paradox argument, Fidentireplica paradox argument, Isoidentireplica paradox argument, Bioidentireplica paradox argument, Enhaidentireplica paradox argument, Insidentireplica paradox argument, Musidentireplica paradox argument, Nrgidentireplica paradox argument, Tridentireplica paradox argument, Comboidentireplica paradox argument, Simidentireplica paradox argument, Itoidentireplica paradox argument,

Fazcontinuum paradox argument, Fazcontinuum paradox, neuropath continuum paradox argument, physapath continuum paradox argument, physipath continuum paradox argument, neuropath continuum paradox, physapath continuum paradox, physipath continuum paradox

awaretheory, superimmortality, science of superimmortality, superatheism, ixperiencit theory of consciousness