Chapter 34
What Death Feels Like — And Why It'S Not What You Think
We have spent most of this book talking about what happens after death. But let me address the question that haunts most people: what does death itself feel like?
The short answer is: nothing. And that "nothing" is the key to everything.
The Phenomenology of Not Existing
You have already experienced the closest analogue to death that biology provides: deep, dreamless sleep.
Recall the last time you fell into a truly deep sleep, one without dreams, without any residual awareness, without the sense of time passing. One moment you were conscious, lying in bed with your thoughts. The next moment — instantly, with no sensation of a gap — you were awake, and it was morning. Eight hours had vanished from your experience without a trace.
Where were "you" during those eight hours? Nowhere. You didn't exist as a conscious being. There was no darkness, no emptiness, no waiting. There was simply... nothing. And then there was something again.
Why You Cannot Experience Your Own Death
This point deserves careful emphasis, because it is both logically trivial and psychologically profound.
To experience something, you must be conscious. To be conscious, you must exist (as a conscious being). Therefore, you can never experience your own non-existence. The moment you cease to be conscious, there is no "you" to register the cessation.
This means that the thing people fear most about death, the imagined experience of non-existence, is literally impossible. You will never experience being dead, for the same reason you will never experience being a rock. Rocks don't have experiences, and neither do dead brains.
The Moment of Transition
What about the process of dying, the moments before death, when the brain is shutting down? Here, we can say something based on actual neuroscience and the reports of people who have come close.
As the brain loses oxygen, consciousness does not simply flick off like a light switch. It degrades. The first functions to go are typically the higher cognitive functions: abstract thought, planning, self-reflection. Then sensory processing diminishes. Then emotional processing. The experience becomes simpler, narrower, less structured, like consciousness folding in on itself.
But these experiences, however vivid, are experiences of a living brain, a brain that is shutting down but still functioning. They are the last flickers of consciousness, not glimpses of an afterlife. And they end when the brain's activity ends.
What Happens Next (Under Superimmortality)
Now let me connect this to the theory of this book. Everything above (the phenomenology of dreamless sleep, the neuroscience of the dying brain, the impossibility of experiencing your own non-existence) is established science. What follows depends on the premises of Ixperiencit Theory. If they hold, the implications for what death means are striking.
Under standard materialism, the story ends there. The brain shuts down, consciousness ends, and that's it. Forever.
Your consciousness ceases when your brain stops functioning. This part is the same. There is a gap, a period of non-existence during which there is no "you."
Under superimmortality, the story has a different ending. Or rather, it has no ending at all.
You will not experience dying. You will not experience being dead. You will experience being alive, and then, after a gap that you do not experience, you will experience being alive again.
Dying and the People You Leave Behind
Nothing in this chapter should minimize the grief of the people who survive you. For them, your death is a loss: the loss of your presence, your companionship, your specific way of being in the world. That loss is real, and it is painful, and no theory of consciousness changes that.
But what superimmortality can change is the finality of that loss. If your ixperiencitness persists (in fragments, in future instances, in the vast web of consciousness that extends through space and time) then the loss is not total. The person who died is not annihilated. The pattern that was them continues, in some form, somewhere.
Grief Under Superimmortality
How should we grieve if superimmortality is true?
We should still grieve, with love, with sadness, with respect for the weight of the moment. Because the loss of this instance is real. The specific version of consciousness that was your loved one, that particular thread in the web, has ended in this form, in this place, in this time.
The fragments of ixperiencitness your loved one distributed (in you, in others, in the culture) continue. A universe this vast, this long, is not done with that pattern. The thread has been cut here, but the web endures, and the thread will be woven again.
But grief under superimmortality is fundamentally different from grief under finality. The relationship is not necessarily over. The theory includes paths where reunion is possible, not as a comforting fantasy, but as a consequence of the same logic that makes the theory work. Among the vast space of possible experiences your loved one's ixperiencitness could take are paths where you meet again, paths where you come to understand each other more deeply than was ever possible in this life.
Key Terms in This Chapter
Read the rest of this chapter
The remaining text (examples, counter-arguments, and longer connective passages) is in the book.